Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Rebecca Noble/Getty Images
FERC Chair Mark Christie said the controversial White House executive order on independent agencies won't significantly change how the energy regulator works.
Why it matters: The EO sparked criticism and fears among FERC watchers that President Trump would erode the commission's political independence as it seeks to fast-track power plants and data center projects.
- Christie, however, told Axios that it's "perfectly appropriate" for FERC chairs to consult with the White House on broad policy matters.
The big picture: Christie said the White House is most likely interested in "big sweeping regulations" that FERC initiates rather than the vast majority of the 1,000 filings it receives each year.
- "Why would any commission initiate a big, sweeping regulation that's contrary to what a presidential administration wants?" Christie said.
- FERC already submits major rulemakings and its strategic plan to OMB, he said.
Between the lines: Christie acknowledged some open questions remain about how the White House may act in specific cases.
- "I would like to know more detail about: What do you mean by 'actions'? How far does that go?" he said, referring to which rules should go to the White House for review.
- He said the commission would continue following the statutes in its gas and electric proceedings and follow strict ex parte laws that prevent any discussion of contested cases without all the parties present.
Zoom in: Christie portrayed himself as in line with the administration on growing out the energy system to meet rising demand.
Christie also said FERC has fired no probationary employees to date and that DOGE hasn't contacted him.
- "We hire, we advance, we promote based on the individual's abilities, which is the way it ought to be," he said.
