Unions face a reckoning with electric vehicles
- Alan Neuhauser, author of Axios Pro: Climate Deals

Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios
The workers who assemble batteries for electric vehicles earn less than their counterparts who build internal combustion cars and trucks.
Why it matters: The pay disparity is just one of the challenges facing the green economy as funding pours in, factories sprout up and workers fill the space.
What's happening: As the United Auto Workers union shifts to electric vehicles, questions are emerging as to whether the promised "green jobs" are as good as clean-energy investors, executives and advocates like to claim.
Of note: Electric cars are commonly described as batteries on wheels. It's an oversimplification, but they're generally easier to make than internal combustion engines.
- Perhaps as a result, workers building the "Ultium" battery used in GM vehicles like the Hummer and Lyriq are reportedly paid one-third less on average than workers assembling internal combustion cars and trucks.
- The disparity is even bigger in some cases. At GM and LG's joint Ultium plant in Lordstown, Ohio, workers reportedly earn $15.50-16.50 an hour, compared to $32 at traditional vehicle plants.
What they're saying: "The wages they’re making are less than the McDonald's around the corner from my house," Art Wheaton, director of labor studies at Cornell University, tells Axios. "So is that really a good job?"
The bottom line: The Biden administration and clean-energy champions have been pushing to promote domestic manufacturing and to show skeptical fossil-fuel workers (and voters) that the energy transition will deliver plentiful, reliable, well-paying jobs.
- The wage disparity suggests that fulfilling that promise will be much more difficult than these advocates and political leaders like to claim.
Worthy of your time: Worker strikes were up 39% this year. Emily Peck reports on the surge in Axios Markets.