Feb 9, 2019

The price we'll pay for a date

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios

Today’s dating app users are willing to pay for more options and control.

Driving the news: Match Group, parent company of apps like Tinder, brought in $1.7 billion in revenue in 2018, with the latter contributing nearly half of it ($805 million) via user subscriptions for premium features. More than 97% of Match Group's revenue comes from subscriptions to its apps.

When it debuted in 2012, Tinder found success among young adults by letting them quickly set up a profile with minimal effort, and chat with nearby users for free.

  • But in 2015 it began rolling out paid subscriptions with premium app features, such as unlimited right swipes, rewinding back, “super likes,” and the ability to switch locations.
  • Today, Tinder has 4.3 million average paying subscribers, responsible for most of the company’s revenue growth.

Unlike early online dating sites, most contemporary apps don’t charge users to send messages to vetted potential dates.

  • Instead, paid features align much more with their users’ more casual dating habits, such as expressing interest in an unlimited number of suggested users or changing their mind about someone they initially rejected.
  • In short, users are happy to pay to have more options of potential dates.
  • More than 60% of Tinder subscribers are paying for the more expensive tier, Gold. Notably, it lets the user see who has expressed interest in them without having to reveal themselves — going against Tinder’s signature double-blind matching model.

These apps tend to generate less revenue per subscriber, but they also spend less to acquire new users and subscribers.

  • Instead they grow via word-of-mouth rather than expensive advertising, says Match Group.

Yes, but: Legacy dating sites like Match.com, which charges users to chat with romantic matches, is still a good business. Rival eHarmony, known for its use of an extensive questionnaire to find compatible matches, had 10 million users and 750,000 subscribers in 2017.

Go deeper: Our special report on the future of dating

Go deeper

Exclusive: Trump's "Deep State" hit list

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios. Photos: WPA Pool/Getty Pool, Drew Angerer/Getty Staff

The Trump White House and its allies, over the past 18 months, assembled detailed lists of disloyal government officials to oust — and trusted pro-Trump people to replace them — according to more than a dozen sources familiar with the effort who spoke to Axios.

Driving the news: By the time President Trump instructed his 29-year-old former body man and new head of presidential personnel to rid his government of anti-Trump officials, he'd gathered reams of material to support his suspicions.

Exclusive: Anti-Sanders campaign targets black South Carolina voters

Courtesy of The Big Tent Project

The Big Tent Project, a Democratic political group focused on promoting moderate presidential candidates, has sent hundreds of thousands of mailers bashing Bernie Sanders to black voters in South Carolina who voted in the state's 2016 primary.

Why it matters: Sanders' rise to the top of the pack, as dueling moderate candidates split their side of the vote, is worrying many in the Democratic political establishment who fear a socialist can't beat President Trump.

Inside the fight over FBI surveillance powers

Carter Page. Photo: Artyom Korotayev\TASS via Getty Images

Over the past year, President Trump has told senior administration officials, including Attorney General Bill Barr, that he wants a major overhaul of national security surveillance powers and the secret court that approves them.

Behind the scenes: In one such discussion last year about the need to reauthorize government authorities to surveil U.S. citizens, Trump went so far as to say he'd rather get rid of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) altogether.