Axios Macro

December 19, 2025
Last chance to enter your 2026 economic projections! Click here by Sunday night to be included in our readers' consensus forecasts, in Monday's edition.
- Today, we look at a striking divergence in the labor market data in recent months — evidence that conditions are worsening more for Black workers than for the overall population.
- Plus, more on the questionable statistical assumptions behind yesterday's shutdown-clouded inflation report.
🇯🇵 Situational awareness: The Bank of Japan raised interest rates a quarter point, as was expected, to the highest levels in three decades.
Today's newsletter, edited by Jeffrey Cane and copy edited by Katie Lewis, is 884 words, a 3.5-minute read.
1 big thing: Black employment milestone evaporates


Labor market conditions for Black Americans are worsening more rapidly than they are for the overall population.
- It's a reversal from just a short time ago, when strong jobs growth meant that Black-white employment gaps were among the smallest on record.
Why it matters: The more dismal labor market outcomes are in step with previous slowdowns, when weaker hiring affected marginalized groups first.
- Unemployment among young adults of all races has also soared, for example.
- But new factors that are specific to this economic cycle — like shrinking government employment — add to the pressure.
By the numbers: The overall unemployment rate has risen 0.5 percentage point this year, hitting 4.6% in November.
- Over the same period, the jobless rate for Black Americans has jumped by 2.2 percentage points, to 8.3% — up from the record low rate of 4.8% seen in the spring of 2023.
Zoom in: The Black unemployment rate has been higher than the overall population since at least the early 1970s, when the government started tracking it.
- But the rates had begun to converge, before blowing out again in recent months. One key reason: shrinking federal employment. DOGE-affected workers fell off payrolls in October.
What they're saying: "The federal government has always been a place where Black people have been able to find employment — quality jobs, benefits, things like that," says Gbenga Ajilore, chief economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
- "There's just been this kind of push toward reducing the federal government through all different means," Ajilore adds.
Between the lines: President Trump touted record-low unemployment among Black Americans in his first term, a milestone hit before the COVID-19 pandemic, as a key economic achievement.
- More recently, Trump has suggested that the administration's immigration crackdown would see more job opportunities go to Black workers — an outcome that has not come to pass.
- The White House did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.
The intrigue: Much of the recent surge in Black unemployment has stemmed from younger workers, another group that has seen unemployment rise as entry-level job opportunities dry up.
- But even among prime-age workers, the trend is concerning: Unemployment rates for prime-age Black workers, aged 25-54, hit 6.7%, up more than a percentage point from the same time last year. The comparable rate for white workers is 3%, the same rate as last November.
What to watch: Gaps in employment have also inched back up after touching historic lows relative to white counterparts.
- Roughly 76% of the Black prime-age population were employed as of November, about 6 percentage points less than the comparable measure for white workers.
- That's a far cry from the record 10 percentage point gap seen in 2011 during a sluggish recovery from the 2008 financial crisis.
- But it is still more than double the smallest gap on record of 2.6 percentage points — a milestone reached in early 2024.
2. Doubts mount over CPI data
Since the last edition of Macro, economists and Federal Reserve policymakers have raised more doubts about yesterday's notably cool inflation data.
Why it matters: Effects from the government shutdown — which prevented the Bureau of Labor Statistics from adequately collecting much necessary data — might be understating inflation in a more substantial way than previously believed.
- "I think the data were distorted in some of the categories — and that pushed down the CPI reading, probably by a tenth or so," New York Fed president John Williams told CNBC this morning.
The big picture: The issue stems from how the BLS handled housing inflation, specifically rents — part of a massive category that alone makes up 33% of the Consumer Price Index.
- In the last year, Fed officials said the government's reading on housing had put upward pressure on the overall measure, even as private data suggested cooling housing inflation.
- In effect, there are now doubts that, at least in October and November, the opposite was the case: artificially low housing readings putting downward pressure on the index.
Zoom in: In October, the BLS "carried forward" some housing data from April, a process that meant index values for rent measures were flat for that month, according to a statement given to the New York Times' Ben Casselman. (Data from November was collected as usual.)
- "Major issue was zeroing out" these gauges in October, Omair Sharif, the founder of Inflation Insights, posted on X yesterday.
- He noted that this would "artificially lower" yearly inflation rates until April.
The other side: "[R]egardless of bias, we know where measured shelter inflation is headed, because we have a very substantial lead on it in the form of market rents. That's far more important than any one data print," Fed governor Stephen Miran posted on X yesterday.
Sign up for Axios Macro



