Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
Mark Lennihan / AP
Time Inc. stock is down more than 13% in mid-day Wednesday trading, following a first quarter earnings report that included lower-than-expected revenue and higher-than-expected losses. All of this means that the venerable media giant is now trading well below the unsolicited $18 per share takeover offer it rejected last fall from Edgar Bronfman Jr. and the solicited $18 per share takeover offer that it rejected last month from Meredith Corp.
According to CEO Rich Battista, however, the blame does not belong to a board of directors who overvalued the company or management that fell short on performance. From the earnings call:
"The noise and relentless media speculation over the last 6 months around the potential change of ownership clearly was a major distraction to our employees and advertisers and other partners, and had an impact on Q1 results."
Bottom line: Blaming the media for your own shortcomings is hardly a novel tactic, but it's not something we usually see an actual media company do. Particularly when there is no indication that any of the reporting was faulty.