Top House Republicans are urging Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to hold hearings on the Green New Deal as they seek to cast the progressive policy as bad for poor Americans.

Why it matters: This effort, which includes a letter and press conference on Thursday, represents congressional Republicans' most detailed response yet to Democrats' push on climate change since last year's election. While largely symbolic, this back-and-forth shows just how quickly the issue has gone from Washington's back burner to front burner.

Driving the news: Signers of the letter include Reps. Greg Walden of Oregon and Oklahoma's Frank Lucas, top Republicans on the Energy and Commerce and Agriculture committees, respectively. House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy is also set to be at the press conference.

  • The Green New Deal is not an actual bill, but instead a non-binding resolution laying out broad goals aimed at drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions along with other progressive policies, like a federal jobs guarantee and universal health care.
  • Republicans say the policies would hike energy prices across the board.
  • "Taken together, we fear the Green New Deal would hurt Americans struggling to make ends meet — the very people it purports to help," the letter states.

The other side: Backers of the Green New Deal, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), say the policy would help fix inequality by creating jobs transitioning to cleaner energy sources.

Where it stands: Because the resolution is not detailed, actually knowing its economic impact is hard at this point. Republicans cite a study by the right-leaning think tank American Action Forum to say the costs could reach $93 trillion. Politico did a piece describing that number as "bogus."

Reality check: Reducing greenhouse gases will come at a cost because they're emitted from almost every facet of our lives. The tough task is ensuring these costs don't unduly hurt the people who can least afford it, and yet is still significant enough to actually address the problem.

What they're saying: So far, Republicans aren't offering any new policy ideas in lieu of the Green New Deal to address climate change, but they are talking about it more. At hearings over the last few weeks, Republicans have talked up how they support nuclear power and hydropower as examples of what they have long supported in this area.

What's next: Backers of the Green New Deal, including the youth-led Sunrise Movement, are hosting a series of talks around the country as they attempt to rally support for the proposal.

Go deeper

19 mins ago - Science

More young people are getting — and spreading — the coronavirus

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

More young people are being infected with the coronavirus, and even though they're less likely to die from it, experts warn the virus' spread among young adults may further fuel outbreaks across the United States.

Why it matters: Some people in their 20s and 30s face serious health complications from COVID-19, and a surge in cases among young people gives the virus a bigger foothold, increasing the risk of infection for more vulnerable people.

Updated 59 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 3:30 p.m. ET: 12,123,257 — Total deaths: 551,384 — Total recoveries — 6,650,507Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 3:30 p.m. ET: 3,084,690 — Total deaths: 132,803 — Total recoveries: 953,420 — Total tested: 37,431,666Map.
  3. Public health: Cases rise in 33 statesFlorida reports highest single-day coronavirus death toll since pandemic began.
  4. Science: World Health Organization acknowledges airborne transmission of coronavirus.
  5. Travel: Young adults are most likely to have moved due to coronavirus.

Judge asks full appeals court to review panel's dismissal of Flynn case

Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images

D.C. District Judge Emmet Sullivan on Thursday petitioned for the full D.C. Court of Appeals to rehear a three-judge panel's decision to order the dismissal of the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Why it matters: The panel's 2-1 decision could be overturned by the full 11-judge appeals court if it decides to take up the en banc review.