Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
David Goldman / AP
Hospital chargemasters shouldn't be written off as irrelevant, a new Health Affairs study says. Those opaque lists of what hospitals charge for every procedure and service dictate levels of revenue and profit and often have no relationship to the quality of care. However, hospitals and private health insurers negotiate payment and networks based on the list price, and high list prices could "strengthen hospitals' bargaining positions," the study says.
Hospitals have defended their pricing practices vigorously and have argued chargemaster prices don't matter since most people don't pay that amount. However, uninsured and out-of-network patients are subject to those list prices, as the New York Times' Elisabeth Rosenthal has reported. And as the Health Affairs authors point out: "List prices reflect hospitals' strategic behavior and have meaningful effects on payments made by and on behalf of patients."
Flashback: Hospital chargemasters hit the national spotlight in 2013 when Axios contributor Steven Brill wrote about them in his Time cover story.