Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
A fracking crew member works outside the Halliburton Sandcastle, at an Anadarko Petroleum Corporation site. Photo: RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images
A majority of investors of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation approved a non-binding, but symbolically important, resolution related to climate change during the producer's annual meeting Tuesday, and similar votes at other energy companies are expected in the coming days.
Why they matter: They’re the latest in a trend of investors increasingly calling on publicly held fossil-fuel companies to be more transparent about how policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions could impact their bottom lines despite President Trump's retreat on the issue.
Driving the news: The proposals mostly call on companies to issue reports assessing how their businesses would fare in a world that cuts greenhouse gas emissions roughly in line with the aspirations of the 2015 Paris climate accord.
- Anadarko had its vote today, with a majority voting in favor of it. The specific percentage will be disclosed at a later date. A spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
- Investors at Wisconsin utility MGE Energy voted down the same type of proposal, with more than 90% voting against it, according to a spokesman.
- A vote at Chesapeake Energy, another oil and gas producer, is set for Friday.
- Utility PNM Resources has a vote scheduled for May 22.
- Across the Atlantic, Royal Dutch Shell faces a high-profile vote also on May 22 that goes far beyond issuing a report, and would hold the company to hard carbon-reduction targets. Its CEO, Ben van Beurden, has urged Shell’s investors to oppose it.
Yes, but: The resolutions aren’t legally binding, but a majority support typically indicates the company will act to respond in some way rather than ignoring it, which companies often do for resolutions that don’t pass the 50% threshold. The process, which for most companies occurs in the spring, has been called "shareholder democracy."
One more thing: We reported last week that a majority of investors at pipeline maker Kinder Morgan approved two key resolutions: One calling on the company to issue a report on how its business would fare amid steep carbon reductions, and another calling for an annual sustainability report. The company disclosed the specific percentages in a filing posted on its website Tuesday. Both measures got just under 60% support.
Editor's note: This has been updated to reflect a vote outcome at MGE Energy.