Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at an event in 2016. Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

If you want to get a sense of how seriously Facebook takes the probe into the site's possible role in Russian election interference, note this: Mark Zuckerberg's brain trust in Menlo Park is paying attention.

Between the lines: It's not uncommon for Silicon Valley giants to rely heavily on their Washington offices to play whack-a-mole on minor policy debates so execs can focus on what they view as weightier business challenges. Facebook is breaking from that pattern as questions about Russia heat up.

Sound smart: The full-court press on this issue shows how serious a situation this is for Facebook — and sends a message that this isn't just a huge moment for the company's political reputation, but its business one as well.

The details:

  • Facebook's top security executive Alex Stamos, who used to work for Yahoo, has put his name to the company's ongoing investigation into Russian efforts. It was Stamos who bylined the disclosure of $100,000 worth of ad buys Russian-linked actors used in some cases to promote posts about divisive political issues before and after the election, and co-authored a paper that tackled the issue back in April.
  • Other staffers on the company's Threat Intelligence team have worked in high-up jobs at cybersecurity firms like iDefense, FireEye and Mandiant, Facebook spokesman Andy Stone said in an email. Their academic backgrounds aren't just in technical subjects common at Facebook headquarters: some have degrees in security studies and international relations.
  • It's drawing on a veteran Capitol Hill team as lawmakers ramp up their questions. That includes Greg Maurer, who used to be a top aide to former House Speaker John Boehner; ex-Verizon lobbyist Brian Rice, who focuses on Senate Democrats; and Myriah Jordan, who used to work for Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr.
  • Communications staffers working on the Russia issue include Stone in Washington, as well as former Obama White House official Tom Reynolds and ex-Googler Jay Nancarrow at Menlo Park HQ.

Yes, but: Not everyone thinks the company's efforts are sufficient. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, wants Facebook to provide more information about possible ad buys. And outside critics think it isn't doing enough to grapple more broadly with its influence.

Go deeper: Axios' Mike Allen took a look at the company's messaging plan as the Russia probe gets bigger.

Go deeper

Federal judge blocks DOJ from defending Trump in Carroll rape defamation case

E. Jean Carroll in Warwick, New York. Photo: Eva Deitch for The Washington Post via Getty Images

A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed the Justice Department's attempted intervention on behalf of President Trump in writer E. Jean Carroll's defamation lawsuit against him, after she accused him of raping her in a dressing room in the mid-1990s.

Catch up quick: The agency argued that Trump was "acting within the scope of his office" as president when he said in 2019 that Caroll was "lying" about her claim.

Updated 43 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Politics: Axios-Ipsos poll: Federal response has only gotten worse — The swing states where the pandemic is raging.
  2. Health: The coronavirus is starting to crush some hospitals — 13 states set single-day case records last week.
  3. Business: Where stimulus is needed most.
  4. Education: The dangerous instability of school re-openings.
  5. States: Nearly two dozen Minnesota COVID cases traced to 3 Trump campaign events.
  6. World: Unrest in Italy as restrictions grow across Europe.
  7. Media: Fox News president and several hosts advised to quarantine.

Pre-bunking rises ahead of the 2020 election

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

Tech platforms are no longer satisfied with debunking falsehoods — now they're starting to invest in efforts that preemptively show users accurate information to help them counter falsehoods later on.

Why it matters: Experts argue that pre-bunking can be a more effective strategy for combative misinformation than fact-checking. It's also a less polarizing way to address misinformation than trying to apply judgements to posts after they've been shared.