Photo: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

National Association of Secretaries of State President and the Secretary of State of Indiana Connie Lawson said states and the Department of Homeland Security had grown into a "good working relationship," if still a somewhat begrudging one, after DHS declared elections critical infrastructure in the wake of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Why it matters: This is a relationship that simply has to work. Intelligence agencies believe states will again face election attacks in 2018, making DHS' technical resources and intelligence capacity critical for local governments who would otherwise have trouble deflecting foreign powers. Meanwhile, the choppy waters between DHS and NASS are based mostly on a bureaucratic hiccup and theoretical arguments about federalism.

"We're getting along just as well as we can in any forced marriage."
— National Association of Secretaries of State President Connie Lawson

The backdrop: States, not the federal government, run elections. All services provided by DHS are voluntary. But many states have worried that DHS declaring elections critical infrastructure at the end of 2016 was the first step toward nationalizing elections.

  • The critical infrastructure designation just means that DHS can provide its full array of services.
  • Meanwhile, DHS spent much of 2017 figuring out how to communicate important information, including specific states that were being targeted by hackers. The department faced procedural issues ranging from a lack of state officials cleared to see classified documents to ingrained policies of alerting contractors running election systems rather than the state itself.

What they're saying : "Admittedly, the National Association of Secretaries [of State] and even myself, we were reluctant when the critical infrastructure designation was made," said Lawson. "But we were reluctant because we didn't understand what it meant and what DHS could do for us that they couldn't already do." She spoke at a press briefing to discuss the recently published A Handbook for Elections Infrastructure Security and "collaboration on best practices for election infrastructure security" at the University of Maryland.

  • "The relationship gets better [every time] a service we offer helps a state or local election official make a decision or do their job," said DHS Acting Deputy Under Secretary Bob Kolasky at the event. Kolasky works with the states on election security issues.

Go deeper

Amy Harder, author of Generate
3 hours ago - Energy & Environment

Climate change goes mainstream in presidential debate

Photo illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios. Photo: Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty

The most notable part of Thursday’s presidential debate on climate change was the fact it was included as a topic and assumed as a fact.

The big picture: This is the first time in U.S. presidential history that climate change was a featured issue at a debate. It signals how the problem has become part of the fabric of our society. More extreme weather, like the wildfires ravaging Colorado, is pushing the topic to the front-burner.

Finally, a real debate

Photo: Morry Gash/AP

A more disciplined President Trump held back from the rowdy interruptions at tonight's debate in Nashville, while making some assertions so outlandish that Joe Biden chuckled and even closed his eyes. A Trump campaign adviser told Axios: "He finally listened." 

The result: A real debate.

Biden to Trump: "I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life"

Former VP Joe Biden pushed back Thursday against allegations from President Trump, saying he had never profited from foreign sources. "Nothing was unethical," Biden told debate moderator Kristen Welker about his son Hunter's work in Ukraine while he was vice president.

Why it matters: Earlier on Thursday, Hunter Biden's former business partner, Tony Bobulinski, released a statement saying Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed overseas business dealings with his son were "false."