Get the latest market trends in your inbox
Stay on top of the latest market trends and economic insights with the Axios Markets newsletter. Sign up for free.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Minneapolis-St. Paul
Tampa-St. Petersburg news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa-St. Petersburg
Liberal advocacy group Public Citizen yesterday sent a formal letter of complaint to the U.S. House of Representatives about Carl Icahn, over his unpaid advisory role in the Trump White House. In short, it argues that Icahn should have registered as a lobbyist before advocating for a change to the EPA's ethanol mandate ― a change that could benefit Icahn's holdings in CVR Energy.
Icahn responded publicly by calling Public Citizen's claims "fake news" (no Carl, that's not what "fake news" is) and then basically arguing his case on the EPA rules (as opposed to the lobbying issue, which he quickly dismissed by saying his lawyers signed off).
Bottom line: It was entirely predictable that accusations of conflict would emerge over Icahn, who continues to pull double-duty as a billionaire activist investor (managing his own money) and as a special advisor to President Trump on regulation.