Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

The federal court decision on Kentucky's Medicaid waiver may be more sweeping than has been recognized — because it shows how any state proposal to impose work requirements, or make other changes that reduce coverage, could be immediately vulnerable to legal challenges.

The bottom line: The DC District Court shot down the Kentucky waiver, including its work requirements, because the Health and Human Services secretary did not address the likelihood that it would cause people to lose their health coverage. And whether you are for them or against them, all work requirement programs will cause some coverage losses.

The details: The court said the HHS secretary has to consider how the waiver would affect coverage for all Medicaid beneficiaries, including the ones who gained coverage through the expansion of the program. That could change the yardstick for the agency in approving a range of provisions in red state waivers, most of which would erode coverage.

It could also mean that more waivers are challenged in the courts, including in Arkansas, Indiana and New Hampshire, states with work requirements that are starting or about to begin.

The impact: The decision throws cold water on waivers for work requirements. Our analysis shows that anywhere from 1.4 million to 4 million beneficiaries could lose coverage if work requirements were implemented in every state, mostly from the red tape work requirements bring for all beneficiaries.

The decision could also hurt the progress of Medicaid expansion, since some purple and red states could be less likely to expand Medicaid, as Virginia did, without work requirements to placate conservatives.

What to watch: Mandatory drug testing for Medicaid beneficiaries, as proposed by Wisconsin, could be open to similar questions. Both the administrative hassles and the testing itself would result in beneficiaries losing coverage.

The requirement to address the impact on coverage could raise problems for other Medicaid changes, too.

  • Some states, including Kentucky and Indiana, are temporarily locking people out of Medicaid coverage if they don't renew their eligibility on a specified schedule or report changes in income that could affect their eligibility. As income and work hours fluctuate, these rules can cause beneficiaries to lose coverage.
  • The decision could also raise uncertainty about premiums for Medicaid beneficiaries, which can make Medicaid unaffordable. The court decision applied to the entire Kentucky waiver, including the state’s proposed Medicaid premiums which would be the highest approved for Medicaid.

Yes, but: The decision could be appealed, or courts could rule differently if cases are brought in other states. The court remanded the waiver to HHS, and it could resurface with changes.

Also, the court did not rule that waivers resulting in coverage losses are always impermissible — only that HHS must address the question of coverage before approving a waiver.

What's next: The waiver process has generally played out far from the spotlight, with both Democratic and Republican administrations stretching waiver authority to further their policy goals. Now, waivers are coming under greater scrutiny, and it’s possible that Kentucky could usher in a wave of similar legal challenges. 

Go deeper

Updated 42 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Voters in Wisconsin, Michigan urged to return absentee ballots to drop boxes

Signs for Joe Biden are seen outside a home in Coon Valle, Wisconsin, on Oct. 3. Photo by KEREM YUCEL via Getty

Wisconsin Democrats and the Democratic attorney general of Michigan are urging voters to return absentee ballots to election clerks’ offices or drop boxes, warning that the USPS may not be able to deliver ballots by the Election Day deadline.

Driving the news: The Supreme Court rejected an effort by Wisconsin Democrats and civil rights groups to extend the state's deadline for counting absentee ballots to six days after Election Day, as long as they were postmarked by Nov. 3. In Michigan, absentee ballots must also be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day in order to be counted.

50 mins ago - Technology

Facebook warns of "perception hacks" undermining trust in democracy

Photo Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Facebook warned Tuesday that bad actors are increasingly taking to social media to create the false perception that they’ve pulled off major hacks of electoral systems or have otherwise seriously disrupted elections.

Why it matters: "Perception hacking," as Facebook calls it, can have dire consequences on people's faith in democracy, sowing distrust, division and confusion among the voters it targets.

Obama: Trump is "jealous of COVID's media coverage"

Former President Barack Obama launched a blistering attack on President Trump while campaigning for Joe Biden in Orlando on Tuesday, criticizing Trump for complaining about the pandemic as cases soar and joking that he's "jealous of COVID's media coverage."

Driving the news: Trump has baselessly accused the news media of only focusing on covering the coronavirus pandemic — which has killed over 226,000 Americans so far and is surging across the country once again — as a way to deter people from voting on Election Day and distract from other issues.