Most climate-related litigation in the Trump era supports protections
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Federal courts have not yet upheld any Trump administration efforts to delay or unwind climate regulations, a new analysis from Columbia University's Sabin Center on Climate Change Law shows.
Why it matters: Courts are a key policy venue at a time when legislation is frozen, Trump is rolling back Obama-era rules, and advocates are pushing for consideration of greenhouses gases to be woven into various federal decisions.
The big picture: The analysis, which updates an early 2018 study, looks at 129 cases in this busy area.
- Far more cases in federal courts support climate-related protections and policies than oppose them.
- EPA and the Interior Department were by far the most frequently sued federal agencies.
The intrigue: Lawsuits defending Obama-era policies are just a relatively small share of total climate cases.
- Instead, many backing protections address trends that pre-date Trump, such as lawsuits pushing agencies to consider emissions when conducting reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
"They also indicate new developments, such as a surge of municipalities suing fossil fuel companies for damages related to their GHG emissions under different tort law claims and a suite of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits seeking transparency from the Trump Administration."— writes the Sabin Center's Dena P. Adler
What's next: Several big Trump initiatives will be litigated in coming years, including looming regulations to weaken Obama-era auto mileage rules.
