U.S. envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad speaks about foreign policy at the Mayflower Hotel on April 27, 2016, in Washington, DC. Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

On Oct. 23, the U.S. and six Gulf partners sanctioned seven Taliban leaders and two Iranian Revolutionary Guard officers for terrorist activity and narcotics trafficking. The slated purpose is to “disrupt Taliban actors and their Iranian sponsors that seek to undermine the security of the Afghan government.”

Between the lines: These financial sanctions are unlikely to have a strategic effect on Afghanistan’s civil war, as the Taliban don't depend heavily on Iranian support. At the same time, however, the U.S.’ Gulf allies have been, at best, haphazard in their imposition of previous sanctions on the Taliban: If they follow through now on sending a real warning, the Taliban might listen.

The targeted individuals likely have few assets that will be affected. Even if they did, though, the Taliban have multiple financial sources and other sponsors besides Iran, whose funding appears to amount to little more than corrupt tips designed to keep contacts open.

Yes, but: The weakness of these particular sanctions doesn't mean the Gulf states couldn’t hamstring the Taliban in the future. The Gulf states provide the group with far more economic and political support than Iran does: Saudi Arabia and the UAE joined Pakistan in recognizing the Taliban’s regime in the 1990s; Gulf patrons provide the Taliban with funds; and Taliban leaders travel frequently in the Gulf.

What’s more, the Taliban are bothered by the symbolism of sanctions. They see themselves as a legitimate Afghan political force that’s castigated while other Afghan leaders — even those guilty of serious human-rights abuses or credibly associated with narcotics trafficking — are internationally accepted.

The other side: The sanctions will also embarrass Iran. The Revolutionary Guard has faced political pressure over its support for proxies abroad, such as Assad and Hezbollah, despite economic needs at home. It may be more difficult for them to defend backing the Taliban, who have Iranian and Shia blood on their hands and play an important role in the heroin epidemic devastating Iran.

The bottom line: Lifting international (especially UN) sanctions on at least some of its leadership has always been high on the Taliban’s list of “confidence building measures” needed to start peace negotiations with the U.S. and, eventually, the Afghan government. U.S. envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad could use these new sanctions as a reminder that, whatever their advances on the battlefield, the Taliban need to make a political settlement.

Jarrett Blanc is a senior fellow in the Geoeconomics and Strategy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Go deeper

5 hours ago - Podcasts

Facebook boycott organizers share details on their Zuckerberg meeting

Facebook is in the midst of the largest ad boycott in its history, with nearly 1,000 brands having stopped paid advertising in July because they feel Facebook hasn't done enough to remove hate speech from its namesake app and Instagram.

Axios Re:Cap spoke with the boycott's four main organizers, who met on Tuesday with CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other top Facebook executives, to learn why they organized the boycott, what they took from the meeting, and what comes next.

Boycott organizers slam Facebook following tense virtual meeting

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Civil rights leaders blasted Facebook's top executives shortly after speaking with them on Tuesday, saying that the tech giant's leaders "failed to meet the moment" and were "more interested in having a dialogue than producing outcomes."

Why it matters: The likely fallout from the meeting is that the growing boycott of Facebook's advertising platform, which has reached nearly 1000 companies in less than a month, will extend longer than previously anticipated, deepening Facebook's public relations nightmare.

Steve Scalise PAC invites donors to fundraiser at Disney World

Photo: Kevin Lamarque-Pool/Getty Images

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise’s PAC is inviting lobbyists to attend a four-day “Summer Meeting” at Disney World's Polynesian Village in Florida, all but daring donors to swallow their concern about coronavirus and contribute $10,000 to his leadership PAC.

Why it matters: Scalise appears to be the first House lawmakers to host an in-person destination fundraiser since the severity of pandemic became clear. The invite for the “Summer Meeting” for the Scalise Leadership Fund, obtained by Axios, makes no mention of COVID-19.