President Trump shows his signature on an Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safe Communities. Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump signed a modest executive order on Tuesday that encourages limiting the use of chokeholds and moves to create a national database for police misconduct.

Why it matters: Top Trump aides recognize that he is under increased pressure to do something to address the mass outcry spurred by the killing of George Floyd. This order, which many lawmakers will say does not go far enough, is intended to send a message that Trump is willing to work with Congress on more meaningful reform.

  • Trump said he had spoken privately with a group of families — many of whom lost relatives to police violence — about the order earlier in the day. He specifically mentioned the families of Ahmaud Arbery, Botham Jean, Antwon Rose II, Jemel Roberson, Atatiana Jefferson, Michael Dean, Darius Tarver, Cameron Lamb and Everett Palmer, Jr.  Floyd's family was not present.
  • Those families were not present in the White House Rose Garden for the executive order signing.
  • The president also encouraged Congress to pass its own police reform legislation.

Despite the executive order, Trump made clear in his Rose Garden remarks that he is still a "law and order" president:

  • "We have to find common ground. But I strongly oppose the radical and dangerous efforts to defend [sic], dismantle and dissolve our police departments, especially now when we achieved the lowest recorded crime rates in recent history," he said.
  • The president said there are a “small number of bad police officers...They are very tiny. I use the word ‘tiny.’ It is a very small percentage. But you have them.”

The big picture: Under the order, police departments that meet certain standards, outlined by the Justice Department, on use of force will be given access to federal grants, a senior administration official said on a call with reporters on Monday.

  • Departments must ban the use of chokeholds to receive such certification, unless an officer is targeted by deadly force.
  • The order also moves to create a national registry to track police officers with multiple instances of the use of excessive force.
  • The order also includes new programs that would help law enforcement officials better deal with mental illness, homelessness, and addiction — including encouraging departments to involve mental health professionals and social workers to work alongside officers in the field.

Worth noting: The order does not address larger concerns about systemic racism and racial profiling in law enforcement.

  • "I strongly oppose the radical and dangerous efforts to defund, dismantle and dissolve our police departments. ... Americans know the truth: Without police, there is chaos. Without law, there is anarchy," Trump said.

Our thought bubble: While the president began with a policy message aimed at addressing longstanding calls from civil rights advocates — including by highlighting the database for bad cops — he quickly broke into standard campaign rhetoric by attacking Democrats like former President Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden.

  • The notion that the Obama administration did not take issues of criminal justice reform seriously is not supported by the facts.

Editor's note: This story has been corrected to reflect that the group of families that President Trump spoke with about the executive order before its signing did not all have relatives who were victims of police violence.

Go deeper

Jun 21, 2020 - World

Exclusive: Trump held off on Xinjiang sanctions for China trade deal

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

In an Oval Office interview on Friday afternoon, President Trump told me that he held off on imposing Treasury sanctions against Chinese officials involved with the Xinjiang mass detention camps because doing so would have interfered with his trade deal with Beijing.

Driving the news: Asked why he hadn't yet enacted Treasury sanctions against Chinese Communist Party officials or entities tied to the camps where the Chinese government detains Uighurs and other Muslim minorities, Trump replied, "Well, we were in the middle of a major trade deal."

Apple's antitrust fight turns Epic

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Millions of angry gamers may soon join the chorus of voices calling for an antitrust crackdown on Apple, as the iPhone giant faces a new lawsuit and PR blitz from Epic Games, maker of mega-hit Fortnite.

Why it matters: Apple is one of several Big Tech firms accused of violating the spirit, if not the letter, of antitrust law. A high-profile lawsuit could become a roadmap for either building a case against tech titans under existing antitrust laws or writing new ones better suited to the digital economy.

Survey: Fears grow about Social Security’s future

Data: AARP survey of 1,441 U.S. adults conducted July 14–27, 2020 a ±3.4% margin of error at the 95% confidence level; Chart: Naema Ahmed/Axios

Younger Americans are increasingly concerned that Social Security won't be enough to wholly fall back on once they retire, according to a survey conducted by AARP — in honor of today's 85th anniversary of the program — given first to Axios.

Why it matters: Young people's concerns about financial insecurity once they're on a restricted income are rising — and that generation is worried the program, which currently pays out to 65 million beneficiaries, won't be enough to sustain them.