Conservatives want to wipe out Obamacare's insurance regulations to make health coverage cheaper — but if they do, it could affect far more than the people who buy health insurance on their own. In a new analysis provided to Axios, the Century Foundation finds that if Republicans turn those regulations over to the states, 91 million Americans in "self-insured" employer plans would be hit too — and they'd probably have no way to get them restored.

Expand chart
Data: The Century Foundation; Map: Andrew Witherspoon / Axios

Here's why:

  • The goal would be to let the states decide whether to impose rules like making insurers cover pre-existing conditions, letting young adults stay on their parents' plans, covering preventive services, and requiring insurers to cover 10 categories of "essential benefits."
  • That could work for the individual market, but not for employers that insure themselves — because those plans can only be regulated by the federal government.
  • The hardest hit state would be Vice President Mike Pence's state of Indiana, where 76 percent of the state's residents who have private employer coverage are in self-insured plans.

The analysis by Jeanne Lambrew, a former health care adviser to President Barack Obama, and Ellen Montz also finds that letting the states define "essential benefits" could leave as many as 13 million individual market customers without maternity coverage, 7 million without substance abuse treatment, and 4 million without mental health services.

Between the lines: It's mainly the Freedom Caucus, along with outside conservative groups, that has been pushing to eliminate the insurance regulations. They argue that the regulations have made health insurance more expensive. But most other House Republicans have been resisting, and they may dig in harder as there's new evidence of the consequences.

Go deeper

The childless vaccine

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

It'll likely be a long time before children are vaccinated against COVID-19, even though vaccinating kids could eventually play an integral role in reducing the virus' spread.

The big picture: None of the leading contenders in the U.S. are being tested for their effectiveness in children. Even once one of them gains authorization from the Food and Drug Administration, there will only be a limited number of available doses.

Progressives bide time for a Biden victory

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Progressive Democrats want to beat President Trump so badly that they're tabling their apathy about Joe Biden — organizing hard to get him into office, only to fight him once elected.

Why it matters: That's a big difference from 2016, when progressives’ displeasure with Hillary Clinton depressed turnout and helped deliver the White House to Trump.

Election influence operations target journalists

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Foreign and domestic actors looking to influence the 2020 election are trying to trick real reporters into amplifying fake storylines. This tactic differs from 2016, when bad actors used fake accounts and bots to amplify disinformation to the population directly.

Why it matters: The new strategy, reminiscent of spy operations during the Cold War, is much harder for big tech platforms to police and prevent.

Get Axios AM in your inbox

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!