Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
Kristopher Radder / The Brattleboro Reformer via AP
A new study in the May 5 issue of Science Magazine shows that human noise pollution has doubled in 63 percent of U.S. protected areas.
Why it matters:
- Human disturbances are supposed to be reduced in these protected areas since they're specifically designed to be safe havens for biodiversity.
- Noise pollution reduces the ability of prey to hear predators approaching, can interfere with finding mates, and can also affect plants if herbivores change their locations due to excess noise.
The good news: Species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act seem to be experiencing about a 56 percent lower noise excess than unprotected areas.
Where to focus mitigation efforts: The authors found that human transportation networks, development, and extraction (think: timber, mining, oil, and gas) correlated with a proximity to cities led to a high noise pollution. Plus, lands managed by local governments had the highest noise levels.