Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
J. Scott Applewhite / AP
The Supreme Court declined today to hear a case surrounding North Carolina's contentious 2013 voting law, leaving in place an appeals court's decision last year that struck down certain provisions as "disproportionately [affecting] African-Americans," per the NYT.
Last year's decision: It struck down portions of North Carolina's law surrounding voter ID requirements, early voting, and voter registration, all of which were found to restrict the voting rights of African-Americans.
But don't read too much into it, per Chief Justice John Roberts: "Given the blizzard of filings over who is and who is not authorized to seek review in this Court under North Carolina law, it is important to recall our frequent admonition that 'the denial of a writ of certiorari imports no expression of opinion upon the merits of the case.'"