Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
Eric Risberg / AP
Gilead Sciences reported yesterday that its earnings fell 33% in 4Q of 2016 compared to the year before, per the Washington Examiner, and the company expects sales to fall another 22% in 2017. This sharp plunge in sales is largely a result of the company's two leading hepatitis C drugs, Sovaldi and Harvoni, which have dropped 65% and 51% respectively.
The drugs have received a lot of flak, both by the public and Congress, for their high prices. Sovaldi cost approx. $84k for a full 12-week regiment when it first came to market, and Harvoni cost nearly $100k. Now competing drugs, like the lower-priced Epclusa, are becoming more powerful rivals.
Why this isn't surprising: A 2015 report from Senators Ron Wyden and Chuck Grassley found that Gilead had ignored concerns about cost and accessibility when setting the prices. ""Gilead knew these prices would put treatment out of the reach of millions and cause extraordinary problems for Medicare and Medicaid, but still the company went ahead," said Wyden.