Smoke billows from a large steel plant in Inner Mongolia, China. Photo: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

Two new analyses argue that a widely cited idea in climate policy and academic circles — to impose a carbon budget — has outlived its usefulness.

The argument: While the idea of a carbon budget has gotten a lot of traction in recent years, two pieces published Monday in Nature Geoscience say the specifics underpinning carbon budget studies have become so complicated and nuanced as to render the tool useless for actual policymaking.

Background: The concept of a “carbon budget” seems relatively simple. It’s the notion that one can only “spend,” or emit, a certain amount of greenhouse gases without exceeding global warming targets.

The details: The studies, one by Glen Peters of Norway’s Center for International Climate Research and the other by Oliver Geden of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany, take different approaches but reach the same idea.

  • Geden argues that from a political science perspective, the carbon budget needs to be reframed as an “if, then” problem to say that goals are only possible if policymakers take particular, ambitious steps.
  • Peters says the conflicting assumptions behind recent studies renders the concept useless for policymakers.
  • However, they both arrived at similar conclusions — ditch the carbon budget talk as it has been used to date.

Why it matters: Shifting estimates and assumptions behind these studies are confusing policymakers — and perhaps preventing them from taking the ambitious actions needed to limit global warming’s severity, both authors conclude.

“The concept of a global carbon budget has been shaping how the broader climate community looks at the core of the climate mitigation problem today. But carbon budgets have only been able to influence climate policy talk, not decisions, let alone actions,” Geden told Axios.

One level deeper: Both Geden and Peters cited a recent study that found nations might be able to emit a considerably more greenhouse gases and still meet the ambitious Paris agreement target of limiting global warming to as low as 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above pre-industrial levels.

  • But they argue such a goal is only possible if policymakers were to take drastic actions now, including steps that are not currently technically feasible — like deploying large-scale carbon removal technologies.
“And irrespective of the temperature target, carbon budgets are beside the point. They are too academic,” Peters told Axios.
“What does 500GtCO2 mean?” Peters said, referring to 500 gigatons of carbon dioxide-equivalent. “I don’t think many would know, you have to map it to a language people can understand, such as 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 (to take an EU example), net zero by 2050, etc.”

The bottom line: How global warming is discussed, even if it’s mostly within the world of policy wonks and science geeks, matters because it helps steer policy.

Go deeper

Updated 28 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 1 a.m. ET: 31,245,797 — Total deaths: 963,693— Total recoveries: 21,394,593Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 1 a.m. ET: 6,856,884 — Total deaths: 199,865 — Total recoveries: 2,615,949 — Total tests: 95,841,281Map.
  3. Health: CDC says it mistakenly published guidance about COVID-19 spreading through air.
  4. Media: Conservative blogger who spread COVID-19 misinformation worked for Fauci's agency.
  5. Politics: House Democrats file legislation to fund government through Dec. 11.
  6. World: U.K. upgrades COVID alert level as Europe sees worrying rise in infections — "The Wake-Up Call" warns the West about the consequences of mishandling a pandemic.

Texas and Louisiana face fresh flood threat from Tropical Storm Beta

Tropical Storm Beta slowly approaching the Texas coast on Monday. Photo: National Weather Service/Twitter

Tropical Storm Beta crossed the Texas coast near the southern end of the Matagorda Peninsula late Monday, the National Hurricane Center said, bringing with it the risk of "life-threatening storm surge" and flooding to parts of Texas and Louisiana.

What's happening: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) made a disaster declaration and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) declared a state of emergency, as the states began feeling the impact of the slow-moving storm — which was causing coastal flooding along the bays near Houston and Galveston in Texas, and the Gulf of Mexico Monday, per the National Weather Service.

Louisville police declare state of emergency as Breonna Taylor decision looms

A demonstrator holds up a sign of Breonna Taylor during a protest in Louisville, Kentucky. Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The Louisville police chief declared in a memo obtained by news outlets a "state of emergency" for the department on Monday to prepare for Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron's expected announcement on the Breonna Taylor case.

Of note: Louisville has witnessed more than 115 days of protests over the police killing of Taylor, an unarmed Black woman, with calls for all the officers involved to be charged.

Get Axios AM in your inbox

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!