Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
This image from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) shows the location with the most impressive known gully activity in Mars' northern hemisphere. / NASA
Scientists are re-thinking how to go about finding life on Mars, per a Scientific American dispatch from a recent conference of astrobiologists, geologists and others.
Key takeaways:
- Maybe we don't have to find life in water. Here on Earth, there are organisms that can survive without water for years and come back to life when conditions are wetter.
- We may have to drill into Mars to find evidence of past life. Yesterday, astrobiologists reported finding fossils of primitive microbes on Earth in what is today a hot, dry region of Australia that once had hot springs. Mars could have had the same environment in its past.
- Microorganisms may have traveled between Mars and Earth on meteorites. Robert Hazen told me yesterday it is entirely plausible that life could have arrived here from Mars but, given the Sun's gravitational pull, it is unlikely it traveled the other direction.