Sign up for our daily briefing
Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday
Denver news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver
Des Moines news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines
Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities
Tampa Bay news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay
Charlotte news in your inbox
Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte
Regas Woods, of the United States, looks on after competing in round 1, second heat, of the men's 100-meter T42 athletics event during the Paralympic Games in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photo: Mauro Pimentel/AP
A group of researchers have determined prosthetics do not have a significant impact on athletic performance, per The Scientist.
Why it matters: There has been an ongoing debate about whether prosthetics give athletes an advantage by enhancing running speeds, jumping, or other athletic movements. The finding may mean those athletes will be able to more easily compete alongside athletes who don't wear prosthetics.
The two findings:
- Prosthetic length: While a longer leg allows someone to take longer strides, the length also makes it harder to swing, resulting in fewer steps.
- Prosthetic stiffness: Stiffer prosthetic parts let sprinting athletes "generate large forces on the ground while decreasing the amount of time they spent on its surface." That became less apparent at increased speeds.
These discoveries resulted in researchers believing "neither measure has a significant effect" on athletic performance.