Jun 15, 2017

NYT corrects editorial on Alexandria shooting after media outcry

Photo by alextorrenegra / Flickr Creative Commons

The New York Times posted an editorial Wednesday night that invoked a debunked 2011 theory that a map circulated by Sarah Palin inspired a shooter to fire gunshots outside of an Arizona grocery store, striking and critically injuring then Congresswomen Gabby Giffords.

The editorial followed the shooting attack at a Congressional baseball practice Wednesday that was carried out by 66-year-old James Hodgkinson, who upon further investigation was found to have deep anti-Republican sentiments and had volunteered for Bernie Sanders campaign. The piece drew comments condemning the reporting from journalists whose audiences represent many different political perspectives, like MSNBC, Mother Jones, The New York Post and National Review Online.

Why it matters: The partisan pull that The Times' editorial says has gripped the country will only get worse with this piece, as it gives conservatives fuel to bash the "mainstream," "liberal," and "elite" media for arguably overstating a key element of their argument.

The piece drew comment from different media outlets on Twitter

  • CNN host Jake Tapper: "even way back in Jan 2011 we knew that Loughlin's obsession began 3 years before the Palin map.
  • WSJ editorial Editor James Taranto: "Unbelievable. The Times is still peddling this despicable lie"
  • New York Post commentary Editor John Podhoretz: "The NYT editorial falsely claims Loughner shot Giffords due to a target on a photo. It's not yet 11. They can change it. Let's see."
  • MSNBC host Chris Hayes: "Let me chime here to say: yeah, that's nuts."
  • Mother Jones senior editor Ben Dreyfuss:"This NYT editorial is, in fact, stupid. Palin didn't make that loon shoot Gabby Giffords. "Rhetoric" didn't make today's whacko shoot either"
  • National Review Online Editor Charles Cooke: "This editorial is an unconscionable disgrace and the Times should be ashamed. Its editorial board is a joke."

Here's the controversial passage from the editorial:

"Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin's political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs.

Conservatives and right-wing media were quick on Wednesday to demand forceful condemnation of hate speech and crimes by anti-Trump liberals. They're right. Though there's no sign of incitement as direct as in the Giffords attack, liberals should of course hold themselves to the same standard of decency that they ask of the right."

And the corrected version:

An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established.

Conservatives react:

  • Washington Examiner article: "NYT still peddling trash about Palin and the Gabrielle Giffords shooting"
  • Daily Caller article: NYT Uses GOP Shooting To Falsely Attack Sarah Palin With Debunked Conspiracy Theory
  • Townhall editor Guy Benson tweets: "Spent all day trying to be fair to the Left, then their 'paper of record' pumps out this libelous bilge. They make it really hard. Seething."
  • Michelle Malkin tweets: "NYT blames Palin's 2010 map for Loughner's fixation w/Giffords that began in *2007.* Read your own paper, liars==>"
  • Mary Katharine Ham tweets: "The NYT is disgusting. Apparently it takes more than six years for the esteemed Gray Lady to understand the facts of a breaking news story."

Go deeper

Bloomberg denies telling a pregnant employee to "kill it"

Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images.

Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg on the debate stage Tuesday denied telling a former employee to terminate her pregnancy.

Catch up quick: Per the Washington Post, a former saleswoman has alleged workplace discrimination against Bloomberg and his company and says Bloomberg told her to "kill it" when he learned she was pregnant. Bloomberg denied the allegation under oath and entered a confidential settlement with the woman.

Debate night: Candidates' last face-off before Super Tuesday

Sanders, Biden, Klobuchar and Steyer in South Carolina on Feb. 25. Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Bernie Sanders wants to keep his momentum after winning New Hampshire and Nevada, while former Vice President Joe Biden hopes to keep his own campaign alive. The other five candidates are just trying to hang on.

What's happening: Seven contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination are in Charleston, South Carolina, for the tenth debate, just days before the South Carolina primary and a week before Super Tuesday. They're talking about health care, Russian interference in the election, the economy and race.

Go deeperArrowUpdated 8 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Sanders to Putin: You won't interfere in any more elections if I'm president

Sen. Bernie Sanders sent a message to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the debate stage Tuesday, stating, "If I'm president of the United States, trust me, you're not going to interfere in any more American elections."

The big picture: It was unveiled last week that Russia has been interfering to boost Sanders' campaigns in an apparent attempt to strengthen President Trump's bid for reelection. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said that "Vladimir Putin thinks that Donald Trump should be president of the United States, and that's why Russia is helping [Sanders] get elected.