Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here. (Today's Smart Brevity count: 1,174 words, 4.4 minutes.)
Streaming companies are accruing more debt to sustain heavy investments in content, Axios' Sara Fischer writes. In addition, their leverage (debt to EBITDA ratio), is higher than it has been historically.
Why it matters: While most analysts agree that the debt loads at most of these companies are manageable for now, some firms are beginning to feel investor pressure to manage rising debt before it gets out of hand.
Driving the news: Under pressure from activist investor Elliott Management, AT&T said last week it will sell its wireless and wired assets in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands for about $2 billion to Liberty Latin America.
AT&T is in a precarious position, argues Jonathan Chaplin, an analyst and managing partner of New Street Research.
For Comcast and Disney, the trajectory is much more optimistic. "Some companies can justify debt because they have defensible niches and stable cash flow," says Michael Pachter, a research analyst at Wedbush Securities.
Netflix, on the other hand, has seen its free cash flow dwindle this year. And as a result, its leverage is the highest compared to many of its streaming rivals and high compared to the industry average. (See chart above.)
What's next: Netflix is under increasing pressure to grow its user base if it ever hopes to offset is massive debt.
Bottom line: What Netflix has going for it is its businesses is "genuinely raising debt to face the shift in distribution models," argues Chaplin. That's a big reason investors remain bullish on the stock, despite the fact that it's burning tons of cash.
Go deeper: How Netflix burns $10 million a day
The lira fell to a nearly 5-month low Monday, again pushing toward the psychologically important level of 6 per dollar, as President Trump pushed forward with sanctions against Turkey, increased previously imposed steel tariffs and threatened further penalties.
What's happening: In addition to Trump's threat that “big sanctions on Turkey are coming," EU governments also agreed on Monday to limit arms exports to Turkey, though they stopped short of a formal embargo.
Deja Vu: In August 2018 the lira fell by as much as 20% in 1 day after Trump threatened to double recently implemented tariffs on metals imports, pushing the currency to its lowest level ever.
The stock prices of major health care companies have not kept pace with the broader market so far in 2019, even though the industry is flush with cash, Axios' Bob Herman writes.
The bottom line: Medicare for All and other health care reforms floated by Democratic presidential candidates, as well as higher-than-expected medical costs at health insurance companies, have made investors nervous about the future.
What's next: Companies are ready to roll out third-quarter reports.
Watch this space: Stock buybacks in Q3 rose 27% from their level in Q3 2018, analysts at Bank of America Merrill Lynch said in a recent note to clients. Health care companies have been the biggest driver with "near-record weekly buybacks" last week, they said.
Follow along: The Axios health care earnings tracker has been updated with Q3 details and also includes large not-for-profit hospital systems.
The Fed has two jobs: Keeping inflation at 2%, and ensuring full employment, Axios' Felix Salmon writes. But what does full employment mean? According to Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari, we're clearly not there yet — despite the fact that the unemployment rate is at a 50-year low of 3.5%.
Why it matters: If we're not at full employment, and inflation remains below the 2% target rate (as it does), then the Fed has little choice but to step on the gas.
Until we see wage growth net of productivity climbing at above 2%, then we're not really at maximum employment. Kashkari, in an interview with Axios
By the numbers: Hourly wages were $27.91 in June, up 3.2% from a year previously. (They've since decelerated a bit, with September's data showing earnings growth of 2.9%.) Productivity, meanwhile, was growing at a 1.8% pace in June. Which means that wage growth after accounting for productivity is well below the Fed's 2% inflation target.
What they're saying: Kashkari tells Axios that the headline unemployment rate is "almost useless" in determining whether the U.S. economy is at full employment.
The big picture: Kashkari is a noted dove, and it's not clear that other Fed officials would agree entirely with his analysis. But it's undeniable that wage growth is low. If Americans started earning more money, the Fed would likely welcome that as a sign of economic health, rather than worrying that it might start causing too much inflation.