I'll be at Salesforce's TrailheadDX developer conference later today, interviewing Mark Hamill. So feel free to hit reply with your pressing Luke Skywalker questions.
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios
When you talk with Facebook executives, you tend to hear a few narratives: that the benefits of what they do outweigh the downsides, that they've already fixed much of what they are being criticized for, and that the media is out to get them for having hurt them financially.
Our new tech editor, Scott Rosenberg, has a piece taking a look at that last issue. He writes:
"Outrage over Facebook's misuse of user data and failure to rein in election fraud is real. But the zeal that media outlets bring to their Facebook coverage is personal, too. It's turbocharged because journalists, individually and collectively, blame Facebook — along with other tech giants, like Google, and the internet itself — for seducing their readers, impoverishing their employers, and killing off their jobs."
My thought bubble: There is certainly a case to be made that Facebook has taken a lot of advertising dollars that once went to news outlets. Personally I blame media companies for not changing with the times more than I do Facebook, but I am sure there are people in media — both executives and worker bees — that do hold Facebook responsible.
Of course resentment over lost revenue is only one factor at play here. Others include the journalistic ethos of holding large companies accountable for their misdeeds, reporters’ natural preference for Davids over Goliaths, and the media’s tendency to follow the herd.
Go deeper: Read more from Scott here, including a good look at the history of media giants blaming the tech companies for eating their lunch.
Apple CEO Tim Cook. Photo: Apple
To the degree that people are concerned about the amount of data being collected by Big Tech, Apple would seem to be the big beneficiary. It gets its money from selling products (and to a lesser degree content and services) rather than through advertising.
It's a point CEO Tim Cook has been driving home, including during an interview on Wednesday with Recode's Kara Swisher, when he said:
"The truth is, we could make a ton of money if we monetized our customer — if our customer was our product. We’ve elected not to do that."
Not so fast: As well positioned as Apple is, it faces one big obstacle: Privacy tends to be a very tough sell.
Another possible winner: To the degree that consumers do shift toward favoring companies with stronger privacy protections, another potential beneficiary is Microsoft. While it does make money from advertising, its history of regulation has made the company more privacy focused than its rivals.
Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios
Law enforcement's ongoing battle to access encrypted data on devices is taking a strange turn: The Justice Department is simultaneously poised to push for new regulations for encryption while coping with a damaging report on how the FBI botched the DOJ's last regulatory push.
Why it matters: At least one congressman thinks the report might hinder any new effort to move encryption legislation through the House. It also gives plenty of ammunition to the already vocal critics of that legislation, including tech companies, security researchers and national security experts.
Check out this Olympic pole vaulter plying his trade — while wearing a Michelin Man suit.