See, going back to work wasn't so bad. OK, maybe it was, but hopefully the return of Login made it just a teensy bit better. That said, the first couple items today aren't likely to give you a warm fuzzy feeling.
Twitter faced renewed criticism Tuesday after President Trump took to the service to taunt North Korea's Kim Jong-un over the size of his, um, nuclear button.
Yes, but: As former HUD public affairs director Brandon Friedman notes, Twitter included an exception in its latest rules on violence and physical harm that exempts governments and militaries.
Other takes: Twitter's former head of news and government Adam Sharp argues that Trump's messages to North Korea are bad policy, but shouldn't be banned. Meanwhile, a group of protesters are planning to demonstrate Wednesday outside Twitter's HQ demanding that either Trump or Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey goes.
My thought bubble: This issue isn't going away for Twitter. The big question for Twitter is what wouldn't they let the president say.
The IT industry is bracing for the disclosure of a major bug in Intel chips that could affect processors going back a decade and require significant updates to Windows, Linux and cloud operating systems.
There already have been some reports on market impact, as rival AMD shares rose this morning.
The big question: Making the software changes needed to mitigate the security risk could result in a significant performance drop, though the amount is unclear. Prominent security researcher Dan Kaminsky says that the worst-case scenario fears of a 30% performance hit is unlikely.
"Let's be a bit cautious about presuming to know the impact of the x86 page table vulnerability," Kaminsky said on Twitter. "This is pretty clearly a big deal, but the right people have been working on it. They're not the kind who would blithely ship a 30% across the board (performance) hit."
What we're hearing: Kaminsky told Axios that there could be some scenarios in which the performance impact is that high, but said that it is unlikely to be that severe for typical computing tasks.
Intel declined to comment.
Be smart: The first fixes might not be the last word on this. With a bug this widespread, there is significant incentive to explore multiple ways to solve the security issue and see which method would have the least impact on performance.
Nokia's former map unit, now owned by a consortium of European automakers, is launching a new effort to aggregate sensor data from millions of cars to help create a real-time map of road conditions.
Why it matters: Understanding not just the map of the road, but what is happening on those roads, is key for autonomous vehicles. It also could help HERE stand out from Google and others in the mapping space.
The details: HERE Technologies says its new service will make use of multiple sensors, including hazard lights, fog lights, cameras, emergency brakes and other components to offer other cars a better sense of what is happening on the road.
More: The company has a video showing sensor data it gathered in Munich last month. It uses the sensor information to show road hazards, accidents, stalled vehicles, rain and other incidents.
Separately: BlackBerry announced this morning that China's Baidu will be using its QNX platform as the basis for its Apollo autonomous driving open platform. The two companies will also work together in other areas, including in-car mapping and smartphone synchronization.
Giphy isn't the only startup trying to build a business out of those lovable, sharable photos known as GIFs.
What's happening: Axios' Kia Kokalitcheva reports that 4-year-old Tenor is expanding the business side of things by allowing select media companies, including PopSugar and Rockyou, to sell GIF sponsorships to their own advertisers and then splitting the revenue with Tenor.
The big picture: That builds on its own efforts to sell campaigns directly to brands, for which it charges between $100,000 and $500,000. Advertisers include AT&T, Wendy's, Nissan, and Domino's.
More: Read Kia's full story here.
FastCompany reported Tuesday on the ways that states are trying to establish their own net neutrality rules, after the FCC repealed federal protections, Axios' David McCabe writes.
Driving the news:
Yes, but: The FCC's repeal preempted state action. That could be a challenge to some of these proposals, but critics of the FCC have doubts that preemption is allowed.
What's next: The net neutrality debate isn't going away, it's just changing venues. Expect battles at the state level, in the courts as well as in the halls of Congress.
Wondering what to do with those leftover Amazon boxes? Try building a cat castle.