Lots to get to, so let's get to it.
Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
President Trump spent a second straight day all over social media getting out his message that conservatives can't get their message out on social media.
Google, Facebook and Twitter, he told reporters, are "trying to silence a very large part of the country," badly mistreating Republican and conservative voices.
For a president who tweets incessantly, the idea that he is being denied a voice strains credulity. Or, as my former boss Kara Swisher put it in the New York Times, "Those who complain loudest about being silenced never ever shut up.”
As "evidence," Trump posted a video — one that appeared uncensored on Twitter — purporting to show Google promoting President Obama's State of the Union addresses from its home page, while failing to do the same for his addresses to Congress.
Google quickly issued a statement, corroborated by screenshots found on the Internet Archive and Reddit, that it had indeed promoted Trump's 2018 State of the Union speech. It had not done the same with Trump's first address to Congress, which was not technically a State of the Union speech, but it noted that it hadn't done so for a comparable 2009 address to Congress by Obama, either.
Yes, but: Regardless of the evidence, it has become accepted truth among many conservatives that Silicon Valley has it out for them. In a recent poll, nearly two-thirds of conservatives said they believe social media intentionally censors conservative voices.
The bottom line: There are plenty of criticisms worth making of Google, Facebook and Twitter, but a vast anti-right wing conspiracy isn't one of them. That said, as Techmeme's Gabe Rivera suggests, if you have a bias for accuracy it could appear to be an anti-Trump bias.
Some of the most damning evidence is the fact that even Google's most ardent critics are refuting Trump's claims, including Yelp spokesman Luther Lowe and DigitalContentNext's Jason Kint.
Google *is* guilty of self-serving search bias, just not the kind Trump is alleging.— Luther Lowe
Kint says that supposed anti-conservative bias will likely dominate next week's congressional hearings rather than real issues of influence and abuse that deserve deeper scrutiny.
Go deeper: Axios' Mike Allen points out that Trump is using the same "fake" playbook against social media platforms that he has used against news organizations.
CEO Satya Nadella. Photo: Microsoft
In a move that could prompt many more companies to offer paid parental leave, Microsoft is announcing today that it will require all of its U.S.-based suppliers and vendors with more than 50 employees to offer such benefits.
Why it matters: Many leading companies offer paid leave, but others need a push. History shows that when progressive companies require benefits or policies from their suppliers, it can help increase adoption. Microsoft's move alone will mean many thousands of new workers will get paid parental leave, as the company has more than 1,000 partners in the U.S.
Some states already have laws offering or mandating paid parental leave, including California. Microsoft's home state of Washington has also enacted paid parental leave that will go into effect in 2020.
"As we looked at this legislation, however, we realized that while it will benefit the employees of our suppliers in Washington state, it will leave thousands of valued contributors outside of Washington behind," Microsoft general counsel Dev Stahlkopf said in a blog post. "So, we made a decision to apply Washington’s parental leave requirement more broadly, and not to wait until 2020 to begin implementation."
What they're saying: Activists praised the move, with the National Partnership for Women & Families VP Vicki Shabo calling it bold and impressive. She said:
"It showcases the ripple effects that state-level public policy changes — like Washington state's paid family and medical leave program adopted last year — can have in changing private sector practice and behavior."
History lesson: It's not the first time Microsoft has required suppliers to offer specific benefits. Three years ago the company insisted that its partners offer full-time workers at least 15 days of paid time off each year.
Jaunt, which once aimed to be the Netflix of virtual reality, is trying some different approaches to stay viable in an era where consumers aren't buying VR headsets at nearly the pace originally predicted.
What's happening now: The company is focused on two businesses, both of which don't rely on a direct relationship with consumers.
The whole point of the business shift, Moretti says, was to "separate the future success of the company from the adoption of tethered VR in the home."
Embracing AR: Like other formerly VR-focused companies, Jaunt now talks about a range of mixed reality experiences, broadening its mission to include augmented reality, which has taken off with the inclusion of tools within Android and iOS.
Separately: The Void, a destination VR company, quietly replaced its CEO last month, Variety reported.
Micron's chipmaking plant in Manassas, Va. Photo: Micron Technology
Memory chip maker Micron Technology announced plans yesterday to invest $3 billion to significantly expand a semiconductor plant in Manassas, Va.
Why it matters: Chipmaking is a key area of high-tech manufacturing still done in the U.S. and Micron said this move alone will create more than 1,000 jobs over the next decade.
The details: Micron said the initial expansion will be completed in the fall of 2019, with production beginning in the first half of 2020.
Also, in reporting about this, I found out that the cat in question has cancer, with a Gofundme page set up in case anyone is interested.