1 fun thing: AXIOS is coming to your TV screen! Catch us Sundays throughout November at 6:30pm ET/PT on HBO to get smarter faster on what matters.
Facebook's Portal video chat device. Photo: Facebook
In separate announcements on Monday, Facebook and Google both showed an impressive level of tone-deafness to concerns about their dominance and lack of attention to privacy issues.
Facebook introduced two home video chat devices, known as Portal, whose nearly sole purpose is to be a microphone and camera in the home, ostensibly for video chat.
Google, meanwhile, disclosed that its developer tools had made a huge chunk of Google+ data publicly accessible, but the Wall Street Journal reported that it had known about it since the spring and decided not to notify the public.
Why it matters: Big Tech is trying to convince officials in the U.S. and Europe that it can clean up its act and needs only modest regulation. This isn't helping.
What they're saying about Google+:
What they're saying about Facebook's cameras:
The bottom line: You might think that 2018 would have taught the tech giants a thing or two about how to be sensitive to security and privacy concerns. You'd be wrong.
Go deeper: Axios' Sara Fischer writes on the global regulatory implications.
Google's Monday revelations will make for an interesting backdrop as the company unveils its fall hardware at an event in New York later today.
The bottom line: There's not much mystery left in terms of the Pixel 3, which has been extensively leaked, but there could be other surprises in store.
Why it matters: The key question is whether Google can take new steps to make hardware a more serious piece of its business. It recruited Rick Osterloh to head the unit back in April 2016. And while Google Home and Chromecast have emerged as significant product families, Google is still a small player in phones, tablets and laptops.
Photo: Bloomberg Businessweek
The denials and doubts continue to mount over Bloomberg Businessweek's bombshell story from last week that authorities were investigating server motherboard maker Supermicro for shipping equipment implanted with chips that China could use to spy on users.
Over the weekend, British and U.S. authorities said they had no reason to discount the denials from Apple, Amazon, Supermicro and the Chinese government.
The latest: One of the few named sources in the Bloomberg piece spoke on a security podcast about his own doubts about the story. Apple, meanwhile, has stepped up its own denials, as Mike Allen reported on Monday.
Why it matters: If the piece is a mistake, it's not a small one. Shares in Supermicro stock dropped more than 50% after the story, wiping away nearly $600 million in market cap. But this isn’t just about one firm’s fortunes — the kind of sabotage described in the story, if real, could compromise major institutions.
Go deeper: Axios' Joe Uchill has more here.
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios
Forbes, the century-old business publisher, is joining forces with Civil, a journalism blockchain network, to become the first major media company to experiment with publishing stories using a blockchain, Sara reports.
Why it matters: Many publishers are skeptical of blockchain tech because it’s new and it’s difficult to understand. Forbes is sending a message to the industry that it thinks blockchain for journalism is the future.
The big picture: Forbes is experimenting with publishing a sample of its content to the Civil Network. Eventually, it could migrate all of its published content over to the Civil blockchain.
Our thought bubble: Forbes loves to jump onto new tech trends early. Almost a decade ago it tried to transform itself into an open journalism platform during the "user-generated content" craze. There's little left today of that effort.
Read more of Sara's story here.
Forget butt dialing. This Hawaiian animal hospital employee was getting repeated calls from a dial-happy gecko.