Oct 18, 2019

Axios Login

By Ina Fried
Ina Fried

Good morning.

Situational Awareness: "Axios on HBO" returns this Sunday!

  • 📺 This week: Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. Mitt Romney talk impeachment, and then the economists behind Sen. Elizabeth Warren's "ultra-millionaire tax" give us an inside look into the plan. Plus, we take a dive into the future of esports. Tune in at 6pm ET/PT on HBO. 🎉

Today's Login is 1,179 words, by the way, a 4-minute read.

1 big thing: The costs of Facebook's free speech

Photo: Riccardo Savi/Getty Images for Facebook

Mark Zuckerberg made an impassioned plea on behalf of free speech Thursday. Then a lot of free speech came back at him.

Driving the news: Speaking at Georgetown University, Facebook's CEO defended the company's decision to continue to post political ads — including some by President Trump's campaign — that make demonstrably false claims.

His arguments:

  • Tech companies shouldn't decide what politicians can and can't say in a democracy.
  • If Facebook stopped accepting all political ads, as some have advocated, that would only favor incumbents over challengers.
  • Doing so would also create a slippery-slope situation, as Facebook would try to draw a clean line between campaign ads and other politically charged issue ads.

In making his case, Zuckerberg cited everyone from the Founding Fathers to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. But while Zuckerberg argued it was the powers that be who had the most to gain by limiting speech on Facebook, civil rights leaders, including King's daughter, spoke out most loudly against Zuckerberg's position.

"I heard #MarkZuckerberg's 'free expression' speech, in which he referenced my father. I'd like to help Facebook better understand the challenges #MLK faced from disinformation campaigns launched by politicians. These campaigns created an atmosphere for his assassination."
— Bernice King

What they're saying:

  • Color of Change president Rashad Robinson: "Mark Zuckerberg made clear today that he is not only doubling down on a business model that corrupts our democracy, but also fundamentally lacks an understanding of how civil rights, voter suppression, and racism actually function in this country. Under the guise of protecting voice and free expression, Facebook, as in prior elections, is giving Trump and the right-wing a free pass to spread lies, hate and misinformation on the platform."
  • Vanita Gupta, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights: "For more than a year, we have worked in good faith with Facebook to develop robust policies to combat voter suppression. But Facebook's policy exempting politicians' content from the company's Community Standards and its fact-checking program undermines all of that progress and will do irreparable damage to our democracy. While we can all agree that free expression is core to our democracy, fair elections must be as well."

Between the lines: Zuckerberg has also faced intense criticism from the right for supposed censorship of its views.

His appeal to the ideal of free expression is aimed at both ACLU liberals and libertarian conservatives, but it ducks key arguments of Facebook critics:

  • Facebook isn't neutral turf on which good ideas will naturally prevail over bad ones, John Stuart Mill-style. It's an advertising-driven business whose design deliberately promotes its own peculiar idea of "engagement."
  • Pre-social media, being "engaged" meant you were committed to a cause. Now it means having your attention seized by something that makes you click. That warps the shape of public debate in ways that Zuckerberg didn't address.
  • Facebook's system for targeting ads — like YouTube's personalization algorithms — allows both politicians and disinformation agents to create deepening tunnels of lies that radicalize sympathetic users more effectively than any previous media form, creating a novel problem that Zuckerberg's historical analogies didn't cover.

The other side: In a pre-speech interview, Zuckerberg told Axios' Mike Allen Facebook has a responsibility to "design systems that can help expose the diversity of ideas, and that don't encourage polarizing content and clickbait and things like that. And we take that very seriously."

Our thought bubble: Things look different from Facebook's ivory tower than from other vantage points.

  • Even after the sobering experience of 2016's election interference on his platform, many of Zuckerberg's arguments start from an assumption of good intentions.
  • Zuckerberg will keep "giving people a voice," Facebook-style, and he's certain that doing so will make the world better — even as evidence to the contrary keeps piling up around him.

Go deeper:

2. Former NBA star launches an Airbnb for basketball

Metta World Peace (left) and Chris Copeland (right). Photo: XvsX Sports

Metta World Peace, the retired NBA player formerly known as Ron Artest, is launching XvsX Sports, a Los Angeles-based startup that aims to be like Airbnb, but for finding a good place for pick-up basketball.

XvsX's invite-only beta in L.A., features a ClassPass-like business model of $5 per month for unlimited hoops, with options for elite, hard-core and recreational players.

Why it matters: 23 million people in the U.S. play basketball, making it by far the largest recreational team sport.


  • XvsX has lined up around 300 indoor courts in the L.A. area, including junior colleges, parks and other facilities.
  • The company hopes to eventually expand throughout the country.
  • Backers include tech entrepreneurs Brad O'Neill, Charles Jolley and FreedomPop founder Stephen Stokols as well as current and former NBA players Al Harrington, Nick Young, Chris Copeland, Jermaine O’Neal and Stephen Jackson.

World Peace had been doing some high-end pick-up games to help those with professional aspirations stay in practice and keep their dreams alive. With the new startup, he hopes to reach even more players.

"It’s revolutionizing basketball," he told Axios. "This platform has never been around."

3. Biometric security's weak spots

While biometrics can offer added security, two separate issues highlight limitations of the technology, especially when used as the sole means of locking a smartphone and user accounts.

Driving the news:

  • Samsung says it is working on a software update for the Galaxy 10 after a user in Britain discovered that using a protective case, in some circumstances, will allow any fingerprint to unlock the device.
  • Google acknowledged that the face recognition technology on the Pixel 4 will unlock the device even if a user's eyes are closed. Apple, by contrast, designed Face ID so that a user must be looking at the screen to prevent someone gaining access by pointing a phone at a dead or sleeping owner.

Why it matters: Fingerprint and face recognition can add simplicity and security, when done right. When done wrong, though, they can put users at risk.

4. U.K. wireless firms relied on Yahoo Groups

It turns out that Verizon's pending shutdown of Yahoo Groups has major implications for British cell phone customers looking to change carriers.

Britain's cellphone regulator Ofcom uses Yahoo Groups to handle porting of numbers from one provider to another, The Verge reports.

The bottom line: It's not surprising to hear that nostalgic longtime Internet users would be sad to see Yahoo Groups' demise. It is very surprising to learn that a government or business was using the platform for any sort of mission critical work.

5. Take Note

On Tap

  • There's not much on the tech calendar, but that gives you more time to celebrate National Chocolate Cupcake Day, National Legging Day, or both. It's also National Exascale Day if you really crave something nerdy.

Trading Places

  • Google has hired former Obama health official Karen DeSalvo as Chief Health Officer, per CNBC.


6. After you Login

Robots aren't just better than you at your job. They are also better at leisure activities, like Jenga. Or a Rubik's Cube.

Ina Fried