Attention Buckeye readers: You can join Axios’ Mike Allen tomorrow morning at The King Arts Complex in Columbus, Ohio, for a breakfast conversation on the future of work.
He’ll be interviewing: Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO; Josh Silverman, Etsy CEO; Francis Davidson, Sonder CEO; and Columbus’ own Jeni Britton Bauer, of Jeni’s Splendid Ice Creams. RSVP here.
AB InBev's SmartBarley system uses AI to improve farmers' productivity. Photo: Ina Fried/Axios
For all the talk around artificial intelligence, recent surveys show just 3%–4% of firms are actually using it for broad-scale business.
Hoping to change that, Microsoft used a San Francisco event Tuesday to show off some of the companies that are using the technology effectively.
Even if they don't know how to get started, companies are interested in the technology, says Julia White, a VP in Microsoft's Azure unit. "People recognize the promise of AI," she says.
The problem, though, is that most still don't know what it takes to get started, White adds. Both Microsoft and the customers on stage Tuesday agreed that it mostly boils down to data. If you want to use AI in your business, you need lots of data and it has to be in a common format.
"Everyone wants to focus on the sizzle," White says. "Where’s my new bot? Well what’s your bot going to learn from?"
In response, Microsoft is increasing its investment in tools that help companies build their own chatbot. The company announced this morning it's purchasing XOXCO, maker of Howdy, one of the first commercial chatbots.
Yes, but: Expectations around the AI business are often overblown today. White acknowledges this, but puts the blame on other companies.
Doubts persist: Maribel Lopez, of Lopez Research, says her research shows that just 3% of companies have invested enough in AI to see a significant return on investment, while 89% said that the big cloud companies have overpromised on AI.
Flashback: MIT-Boston Consulting Group released a survey a year ago that also said American business executives expect AI to have a large impact on their companies but few were actually adopting the needed technologies.
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios
With Amazon making its HQ2 choices official, everyone is now weighing in on how the decision will impact everything from tax revenue to public transit and the political fallout.
Details: Amazon is splitting HQ2 (and the 50,000 jobs that come with it) between two regions: New York's Long Island City and Arlington, Virginia.
Here are some of the smartest and funniest comments...
The housing impact:
"Northern Virginia property owners are delighted Amazon HQ2 is moving in. Renters, first-time buyers and low-income residents aren’t."— Tracy Jan and Kathy Orton write in the Washington Post
"New York is going to pay on average $48,000 for each of 25,000 jobs Amazon will create. It’s a $1.5 billion direct subsidy of the company. (I wonder what they think they’ll get back in taxes, over what period.)"— Wall Street Journal tech columnist Christopher Mims tweets
"Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here."— Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweets, with a more critical viewpoint
"Excited to see how New York’s very well funded, often empty, and totally fine subway system will support Amazon’s new LIC office!"— The Verge's Dieter Bohn tweets, with just a hint of sarcasm
The politics: The New York Times' Mike Isaac said two people mentioned to him that a big benefit of splitting HQ2 is that Amazon now has more politicians that view it as a key employer:
“HQ2 split among two cities gets them twice as many senators.”
The bottom line: Even split across two cities, HQ2 will bring a substantial number of jobs and other benefits. It will bring headaches, too.
Marc Benioff talking to Kara Swisher. Photo: MSNBC
Salesforce founder Marc Benioff lashed out at Facebook in a new interview with MSNBC, doubling down on his contention that the social network is akin to a digital-style tobacco company.
"Facebook is the new cigarettes," he tells Kara Swisher during a half-hour MSNBC special that will air Sunday at 10pm ET. "You know, it's addictive. It's not good for you. ... The government needs to step in."
Swisher: That's a strong comparison, cigarettes.
Benioff: Well, I think it's the right comparison.
Swisher: Cigarettes kill you.
Benioff: Well, I think this is — the right comparison that we can see that, you know, Facebook can have very serious effects on society the same way that cigarettes can.
Plus: Benioff also spoke with Swisher about his purchase of Time magazine and his fight with other tech CEOs over San Francisco's recently passed Prop C initiative to help combat homelessness. You can see a video clip here.
The Federal Communications Commission will launch the first of two major spectrum auctions today as the wireless industry tries to get the bandwidth it needs to deliver 5G.
Why it matters: The regulator is under pressure from the big wireless carriers to make 5G a reality, Axios' David McCabe reports.
The details: On Wednesday morning, the FCC will start taking bids for spectrum in the 28 GHz band.
By the numbers: There are 40 bidders qualified for the first auction, which required an upfront payment, and 58 completed applications for the second, per officials.
Go deeper: Bidding in the first auction can be tracked here.
It wasn't really Ross from "Friends" that recently got arrested in London, but it sure looked like him.