Good morning, tune into the fourth episode of "Axios on HBO" on Sunday at 6:30pm to hear from Bill Gates on some of the issues we cover here in Generate and in my Harder Line column regularly.
Speaking of that, my latest column looks at the Obama-era environmental policies President Trump isn't rolling back, including a scoop on the latest sage grouse conservation plans. I'll share that, and then Ben Geman will guide you through the rest of today's news.
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios
Let’s clear the decks: Nobody is confusing President Trump with Al Gore and nobody ever will. But…
Between the lines: Behind Trump’s aggressive agenda rolling back environmental regulations are a small handful of moves that look like they might have come from the Obama administration — and some of them even did.
Here are 5 policies Trump is moving ahead with, or at least leaving alone:
1. Bird conservation plans: Last year, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke signaled he was prepping a big overhaul of a 2015 deal Barack Obama’s Interior Department inked with Western governors and others to protect the sage grouse.
2. Truck pollution standards: Announced last week, the Environmental Protection Agency’s plans to tighten nitrogen-oxide standards for big trucks marks the first time Trump’s EPA moved to make an air-pollution regulation more stringent, not less.
3. Offshore wind leasing: Interior has prioritized new federal leasing of water for offshore wind power, and it announced last month it had scheduled a highly anticipated auction of federal waters off Massachusetts for Dec. 13.
4. Onshore wind and solar rule: Just days after Trump’s election victory, Obama’s Interior issued a final rule governing leasing for wind and solar power on federal lands. It remains in place today.
5. Kigali climate-change amendment: Named after the Rwandan city where it was signed in October 2016, the Kigali amendment to the Montreal Protocol, an environmental treaty, phases down the use of potent greenhouse gases known as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
Go deeper: Click here to read the full details of each policy.
Breaking Monday: "Russia’s energy minister insisted the country and its allies in OPEC need to watch the oil market in the coming weeks before making any decisions to cut output," Bloomberg reports.
Why it matters: The Russian wavering is a sign of tricky negotiations looming in Vienna next month with OPEC and allied producers will discuss dialing back production to prop up prices, which have tumbled by roughly $20 per barrel since early October.
The intrigue: The Bloomberg piece lays out why Russian and Saudi interests are only aligned up to a point.
But, but, but: "Market expectations continue to grow that OPEC+ will agree to cut production at their meeting in early December by anywhere between 1-1.4MMbbls/d," ING analysts said in a note Monday.
Officials from several oil, power and industrial giants say in a new analysis that there's a cost-effective path to "net-zero" emissions by 2060 from economic sectors that are tricky to decarbonize — like cement, steel, chemicals, heavy trucking, and shipping.
Why it matters: While clean power and passenger vehicle tech gets lots of attention, one huge challenge is economically wringing carbon out of what the report calls "harder to abate" areas that account for nearly a third of industrial and energy emissions.
The big picture: The new report arrives weeks after a major UN-led scientific analysis concluded that to keep warming within 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels, human-caused CO2 emissions must reach "net zero" by roughly mid-century.
Who they are: The Energy Transitions Commission is a 3-year-old body of executives and officials from roughly 30 entities, including...
What they found: Getting to net-zero from these "harder to abate" sectors could be done for less than 0.5% of global GDP using largely known technologies, although a number have yet to reach commercial readiness, and more innovation is needed.
Their roadmap is a mix of strategies broadly grouped around energy efficiency gains, reducing demand with steps like better transport logistics, and promoting electrification, hydrogen, sustainable bio-energy, and carbon capture.
The intrigue: It won't happen without a bunch of policy shifts, the group said, such as...
Axios Expert Voices contributor Anna Mikulska writes...
Between early August and early October, crude oil prices shot up by approximately $20 per barrel in anticipation of the Trump administration's Nov. 5 re-imposition of oil export sanctions on Iran. But in the first week of October, amid speculation of a $100-per-barrel market, crude prices suddenly reversed course.
Between the lines: The reversal illuminates the influence of geopolitics on the crude market, including the shifting role of Saudi Arabia as a major balancing force. Saudi Arabia ultimately bowed to U.S. pressure, but its hesitation speaks to an erosion of the U.S.–OPEC relationship as Russia’s influence has grown.
Background: Saudi Arabia initially declined to heed U.S. calls to increase crude oil production, and prices began to rise. Only in the wake of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder did the Saudi government commit to production increases.
The big picture: Concerns about high crude prices are giving way to worries about their precipitous fall, which has called attention to recent geopolitical shifts:
Meanwhile, Russian influence in the Middle East appears to be growing.
Read more of the piece in the Axios stream.
Mikulska is a nonresident fellow in energy studies at Rice University’s Baker Institute's Center for Energy Studies and a senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania's Kleinman Center for Energy Policy.
Oil companies active in the Permian Basin are jointly pledging $100 million over several years toward education, infrastructure, housing needs and workforce training in the region at the epicenter of the U.S. production boom.
Why it matters: The weekend announcement from the Permian Strategic Partnership is a recognition that the oil surge is also creating problems in the region.
By the numbers: This Reuters piece on the effort has some snapshots of the region's problems amid the boom, including...
Who they are: The group of over a dozen companies includes Chevron, Shell and the Exxon unit XTO Energy, as well as large independent producers like Anadarko and Pioneer Natural Resources, and drilling services giants Halliburton and Schlumberger.
What's next: The group says it's opening an office and announcing leaders and staff in coming months and convening meetings with local stakeholders. They want to aid, not duplicate, the work of governments and civic groups.
Who tweeted it: Jason Bordoff is founding director of Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, and a former White House energy adviser under Obama.