Welcome back to @Work. I'll be fielding your feedback at erica@axios.com or @erica_pandey on Twitter.
Today's edition is 1,634 words, a 6-minute read. We'll begin with...
Welcome back to @Work. I'll be fielding your feedback at erica@axios.com or @erica_pandey on Twitter.
Today's edition is 1,634 words, a 6-minute read. We'll begin with...
Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios
One year into the pandemic, more than 10 million Americans are still out of work — and many of the jobs they lost won't even exist when this is over.
The big picture: Putting the country back to work will require vast amounts of retraining and career shifting, as former bartenders learn to code and former cruise ship workers look for jobs at data centers. The U.S. is still unprepared to take that on at scale.
What's happening: Job training and reskilling will be an essential part of America's post-pandemic bounce back, but neither of the two COVID relief bills passed during the last year earmarked any money for it.
By the numbers: The pandemic's disruption of work will push around 17 million U.S. workers to find new occupations by 2030, according to a recent McKinsey Global Institute report.
"We knew artificial intelligence was going to devastate jobs, but, frankly, I thought that was five or seven years away," says Plinio Ayala, CEO of the job training company Per Scholas.
All of this points to an urgent need for the U.S. government and companies to invest in retraining the workforce, but job training remains underfunded at the federal level. And it's a patchwork system in the private sector.
But, but, but: The reskilling crisis has not yet gotten much attention in Washington. Says Carnevale, "I doubt anybody would go to the floor and vote against training right now, but there is no prominent bill."
What to watch: On the campaign trail, Biden called for a $50 billion federal investment in workforce training. If such a sizable investment becomes a reality, it could help millions of Americans switch careers post-pandemic.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Making the shift back to work after having a baby is always jarring. Doing it during a global pandemic is isolating and can be emotionally crippling — and that could drive a cohort of new moms out of the workforce, my colleague Kim Hart writes.
Why it matters: 1 in 4 women are thinking of downshifting their careers or leaving the workforce altogether, according to data from McKinsey and Lean In. Experts say the risk is higher for mothers trying to return to work without the support systems and child care options they may have had pre-pandemic.
Quick take: Last month, I came back to work after taking time off to care for my daughter, who was born eight weeks premature. She is my third child, so I thought I knew how to manage the transition. Boy, was I wrong.
The big picture: "The issue with the system is, at best, it's not set up to support working mothers or working families, and at worst, it really works against them," said Danna Greenberg, professor at Babson College and co-author of "Maternal Optimism," on a Harvard Business Review podcast on the topic.
On top of that, in March 2018, only 17% of civilian workers had access to paid family leave, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
The pandemic was a major test of whether essential workplaces could keep their workers safe — and many of them failed.
Why it matters: The missteps of employers and the lack of oversight from federal agencies may have led to deaths across America.
Driving the news: The Wall Street Journal's Alexandra Berzon, Shalini Ramachandran, and Coulter Jones are out with a deep dive on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and its failings amid the pandemic.
The historically underfunded and understaffed OSHA was ill-equipped to handle a workplace hazard as far-reaching as the coronavirus pandemic, they write:
The big picture: The workplace safety crisis is far from over.
Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Paul Marotta/Getty Image
COO Sheryl Sandberg thought Mark Zuckerberg was "nuts" when he raised the possibility in January 2020 that 50,000 Facebook employees might have to work from home. By March 6, they were, Axios' Jacob Knutson writes.
The big picture: In an interview Monday with Axios Re:Cap, Sandberg explained how Facebook moved quickly to respond to the pandemic with grants for small businesses and work-from-home stipends for its employees, and how the company has been watching the unfolding crisis for women in the workforce.
Flashback: "In January, Mark told me and others that we should get ready for the possibility that we would all have to work from home and there might be a pandemic," Sandberg told Axios Re:Cap host Dan Primack.
Axios is looking back at the week of March 9, 2020 — the week high-profile leaders were forced to make consequential choices that upended society.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
"She-cession" threatens economic recovery (Axios)
Remote work opens up new possibilities for autistic workers (Wall Street Journal)
What long-term pandemic brain feels like (The Atlantic)
The robots are coming for Phil in accounting (New York Times)
Last week, I wrote about the future of workplace benefits. Well, one of those could be getting paid to get a good night's sleep.
What's happening: WHOOP, the fitness company, has a sleep bonus. Employees who wear the WHOOP fitness tracker and achieve 85% or more of their sleep need for a given month get $100.
Thanks for reading!