The answers to why Trump canned Comey are becoming clear: The president was filled with grievance about the FBI probe and acted on impulse without clearly thinking through the fallout, numerous sources tell me.
The consequences are also becoming clear: This one quick decision put everything at unnecessary risk, from his legislative agenda to his public standing — and potentially his presidency.
"It is a debacle," said one Republican in constant touch with the West Wing. "They got everything — timing, rationale, reaction — completely wrong."
As one Republican put it to me: "The team are rank amateurs who picked a fight with the intelligence agencies and the FBI. Hard to unite those historically competitive organizations. And they have the ability to find out almost anything!"
Sound smart I: This crisis of his own making is about to get worse.
Sound smart II: Wait, Spicer's to blame?! Hard to see how anyone could magically spin your boss abruptly canning the guy investigating the very legitimacy of his job.
Trump on Comey: "infuriated" ... "white hot" ... "enraged ... fuming about Russia" ... "impatient with what he viewed as his sanctimony" ... "There was 'something wrong with' Mr. Comey, he told aides."
Blows massive hole in White House account — WashPost's Philip Rucker, Ashley Parker, Sari Horwitz and Robert Costa: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein "threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation."
Wall Street Journal's Shane Harris and Carol Lee: "Comey started receiving daily instead of weekly updates on the investigation, beginning at least three weeks ago ... Comey was concerned by information showing possible evidence of collusion."
WashPost: "Within the Justice Department and the FBI, the firing of Comey has left raw anger, and some fear ... Trump had 'essentially declared war on a lot of people at the FBI' one official said. 'I think there will be a concerted effort to respond over time in kind.'"
Key Republicans agree the firing intensified the investigations ... From an L.A. Times analysis, "By firing Comey, Trump may have fanned the flames he hoped to control," by David Lauter:
"In an email lament circulated among prominent Republicans, A.B. Culvahouse Jr., former Reagan White House counsel and head of Trump's vice presidential search effort, said the firing 'both prolongs the FBI/DOJ investigation and undermines the credibility of the Trump campaign's denials of no conspiracy with Putin.' 'We could be talking about Russian hacking in the mid-terms at this rate.'"
N.Y. Times' Matthew Rosenberg and Matt Apuzzo: "Comey's firing appears to have imbued the Senate Intelligence Committee with a renewed sense of urgency."
Be smart ... Bob Woodward on "Morning Joe": "The FBI is not running the investigation. The investigation is overseen by prosecutors. There are now stories that there are grand juries. They're looking at this. They're issuing subpoenas. That's not being done by the FBI. That's being done by prosecutors in the Justice Department. That's where the ball rests."
Breaking ... "Statement of Roger Stone," re stories reporting that he had recommended the firing of Comey: "I am not the source of the New York Times, Politico or CNN stories and have never claimed I convinced the President to fire FBI Director Comey ... I believe the source of this story is someone in the President's circle who thought that my longtime association with President Nixon would bring inevitable comparisons with the so-called Saturday Night Massacre and thus discredit the option of firing Mr. Comey."
"Morning" Joe Scarborough: "[A]s you look at how Donald Trump has ravaged the Justice Department and the law enforcement arm of the executive branch, it is now up to the United States Senate to actually stand up to a man who sees himself as an authoritarian, an autocrat, a man whose power is not to be questioned."
Historian Michael Beschloss, on "Morning Joe": "Nixon fired Archibald Cox, the Watergate special prosecutor, and his intention was to shut down that Watergate investigation. ... [T]he only reason that things changed was that members of the Senate — especially members of Nixon's own party, Republicans — said, 'You know, this is not something that shows respect for our institutions and our democracy. This is the way an autocrat behaves, and you cannot have an investigation that's done by your own Justice Department.'
"They demanded a new special prosecutor, and only because of that protest, both in the Senate and the House and by Americans across the country, was Nixon forced to hire a new special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, who was just as tough."
N.Y. Times Quote of the Day ... Sen Dick Durbin (D-Ill.): "I think the Comey operation was breathing down the neck of the Trump campaign and their operatives, and this was an effort to slow down the investigation."
NYT rounds up "How the Right and Left Reacted to Comey's Firing."
The N.Y. Times' Mike Shear posts an insider account of what it was like to be at the White House when the Comey news broke, "Breaking the Comey News, One Sentence at a Time":
I had arrived at the White House just in time to meet the 6 p.m. deadline to turn in my passport and visa applications for President Trump's first foreign trip next week. I walked through a mostly-deserted press briefing room ... and into the cramped office known as Lower Press, where White House press aides sit. There, I saw Sean Spicer, the press secretary, huddled over a computer, with all his assistants crowded around him. ... Something was clearly going on.
After a few minutes, Mr. Spicer opened the door and announced to me and the half dozen other reporters who were nervously waiting that something important would be in our inboxes momentarily. ... Spicer pointed to ABC's Jon Karl. 'It's your question from the briefing,' he said, smiling. 'Comey?' Mr. Karl offered, recalling that he had asked Mr. Spicer whether the president still had confidence in the F.B.I. director. Mr. Spicer smiled broadly and put his finger on his nose.
TIME's cover is "Trump After Hours: From where the 45th President works, eats and sleeps, everything is going just great. Now if only everyone else would see it that way," by Michael Scherer and Zeke Miller:
The waiters know well Trump's personal preferences. As he settles down, they bring him a Diet Coke ... With the salad course, Trump is served what appears to be Thousand Island dressing instead of the creamy vinaigrette for his guests. When the chicken arrives, he is the only one given an extra dish of sauce. At the dessert course, he gets two scoops of vanilla ice cream with his chocolate cream pie, instead of the single scoop for everyone else. ...
[F]ew rooms have changed so much so fast as his dining room, where he often eats his lunch amid stacks of newspapers and briefing sheets. A few weeks back, the President ordered a gutting of the room. ... He watches the [TV] screen like a coach going over game tape, studying the opposition, plotting next week's plays. "This is one of the great inventions of all time— TiVo," he says as he fast-forwards through [clips about Russia from a Senate hearing]. ...Trump says he used his own money to pay for the enormous crystal chandelier that now hangs from the ceiling. ... But the thing he wants to show is on the opposite wall, above the replace, a new 60-plus-inch at-screen television that he has cued up with clips from the day's Senate hearing on Russia. Since at least as far back as Richard Nixon, Presi- dents have kept televisions in this room, usually small ones, no larger than a bread box, tucked away on a sideboard shelf. That's not the Trump way.When asked directly if he feels his Administration has been too combative, he makes a brief allowance. "It could be my fault," he says. "I don't want to necessarily blame, but there's a great meanness out there that I'm surprised at."
Trump defines "Trumponomics" when asked by The Economist: "[I]t really has to do with self-respect as a nation. It has to do with trade deals that have to be fair, and somewhat reciprocal, if not fully reciprocal. And I think that's a word that you're going to see a lot of, because we need reciprocality in terms of our trade deals. ... I'm absolutely a free-trader. I'm for open trade, free trade, but I also want smart trade and fair trade."
Act I ... WashPost's Jenna Johnson on Tuesday night, "After Trump fired Comey, White House staff scrambled to explain why": "As Democrats and Republicans began to criticize and question the firing with increasing levels of alarm, Spicer and two prominent spokeswomen [Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kellyanne Conway] were suddenly speed-walking up the White House drive to defend the president on CNN, Fox News and Fox Business."
"After Spicer spent several minutes hidden in the bushes behind these [TV standup] sets, Janet Montesi, an executive assistant in the press office, emerged and told reporters that Spicer would answer some questions, as long as he was not filmed doing so. Spicer then emerged."
Act II ... "Spicer in the bushes" trends hard: "Someone mashed Sean Spicer with that GIF of Homer Simpson hiding in the bushes" ... "11 Hilarious Memes of Sean Spicer Literally Hiding in Bushes" ... "Spicer Hid in the Bushes ... and the Internet Roasted Him in Seconds" ... "A Sean Spicer In The Bushes Meme-Fest" ... "17 Of The BEST Sean Spicer Hiding In Bushes Memes The Internet BLESSED Us With Today."
Act III ... WashPost "EDITOR'S NOTE" added to Jenna's dispatch: "This story has been updated to more precisely describe White House press secretary Sean Spicer's location late Tuesday night in the minutes before he briefed reporters. Spicer huddled with his staff among bushes near television sets on the White House grounds, not 'in the bushes,' as the story originally stated."
So NEVER MIND, "Saturday Night Live" writers' room!
The Fox News bill for settlement payments so far, per CNN's Brian Stelter: $45 million.
P.S. "Snap's stock plummets after missing earnings goals," by Axios' Sara Fischer: "Snap's pitch to investors when it went public was that, although it wouldn't be profitable this quarter, user growth and investments in ad technology would bring profitability in the foreseeable future.
"Based on reactions to its first earnings call, investors aren't confident. Shares were down nearly 25% after trading Wednesday to roughly $17.5 per share, negating any growth it experienced after going public at $17 per share in March."
Americans like watching TV content on big screens, according to Axios' Sara Fischer.