Oct 11, 2017

Look for the EU to continue its crackdown on U.S. big tech

Coke, beer and Apple in Barcelona. Photo: Marimba James / Creative Commons

The European Union, arguing that U.S. tech titans have unfair, and in some cases illegal, advantages over competitors, is cracking down in what it calls evening the playing field and saving local businesses.

Why it matters: Big American tech companies say Europe's tightened regulations and higher taxes, while meant to protect European citizens and their businesses, could isolate the EU and stifle innovation.


EU regulators have been far more aggressive in policing technology companies than their counterparts in the U.S., and their plans to impose heftier taxes and fines around antitrust and privacy regulations suggest that they have no intention of curbing their efforts. Meanwhile, some of the biggest regulatory actions are underway in Europe, and they will reshape how U.S. tech companies do business abroad moving forward.

  • New tax rules: Last month, EU regulators, saying that international tax laws are outdated, laid out new mandates to be proposed if there is no rewrite by next spring. Among recommendations are an "equalization" tax on digital revenue, and a "withholding" tax on digital transactions with companies outside the EU.
  • More open data: One sweeping new EU regulation, called the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), is set to roll out in 2018 and would require that EU citizens receive more information about what data tech collects and why. Companies will face fines of up to 4% of their global annual revenue for non-compliance and breaches.
  • Cookie regulation: A revised version of the EU's ePrivacy directive, set to be enacted in May 2018, will add greater regulation of cookies, tracking, and opt-out options.


  • Apple: Last year, the European Commission ordered Apple to pay Ireland €13 billion ($15.3 billion) in back taxes. Tired of waiting for Apple to pay up, the commission on Oct. 4 said it is taking Ireland to court to force its implementation.
  • Facebook: In May, the EU fined Facebook $122 million for providing faulty information about its acquisition of WhatsApp. That was roughly two months after the EU fined the company 150,000 Euros for violating data privacy standards.
  • Google: In March, the EU hit Google with an antitrust complaint for over-imposing contractual restraints on Android manufacturers. And in June, EU antitrust officials slapped Google with a massive €2.42 billion ($2.7 billion) fine for abusing its market dominance to steer customers toward its own shopping platform.
  • Amazon: Last week, European regulators ordered Amazon to pay back €250 million ($294 million) in taxes to Luxembourg after determining the company had been granted an "illegal" tax advantage dating back to 2003.
  • Google and Facebook: Today, UK Prime Minister Theresa May, irritated with Russia's political activism on social media, said she is considering regulating Google and Facebook as news organizations.


Margrethe Vestager, EU Competition Commissioner:

  • Vestager has been the driving force behind the increased crackdown on big tech. And despite several firms arguing that she has been targeting only non-European companies, Vestager maintains that "this is about competition in Europe, no matter your flag, no matter your ownership."

Argi Sampedro, EU Public Affairs Account Executive at Cicero, a London and Brussels-based consulting firm:

  • "The political pressure for EU action comes from the perception that US tech giants are not paying their fair share of tax in Europe. They are also seen as companies with enormous power that take no responsibility (illegal online content, fake news, data protection)."

Dean Garfield, president and CEO of the Information Technology Industry Council in the U.S., told Axios:

  • "I think Europeans have legitimate and sincere interests that are culturally rooted and may be distinct from the U.S. ... But at the same time, they handle the threat of American innovation ... by creating regulations that give European companies an advantage."
  • His bottom line: "The implications are real. These actions drive up costs and have a real business impact. That's not to suggest no regulation is appropriate. It's just finding the right balance without undermining innovation."

James Cooper , associate professor of law and director of the Program on Economics & Privacy at GMU's Antonin Scalia Law School, told Axios:

  • "The EU is all about getting disparate countries to come together as one. And part of the reasoning behind many of its regulations was to create a common economic market among countries within the EU."
  • "But most recently these regulations have been used not to promote intra-euro trade, but to level the playing field between EU companies and U.S. companies. And in that respect the EU is targeting U.S. companies."


As the world moves further from an industrial economy to the digital and AI-enabled economy, countries across the globe are scrambling to make sense of it all, and part of that is creating rules to help control the change and where the power resides. Big tech has so far been the leader in dealing with the information age, but the EU is reasserting control through regulations.

Go deeper

In photos: How coronavirus is impacting cities around the world

Revellers take part in the "Plague Doctors Procession" in Venice on Tuesday night during the usual period of the Carnival festivities, most of which have been cancelled following the coronavirus outbreak in northern Italy. Photo: Andrea Pattaro/AFP via Getty Images

The novel coronavirus has spread from China to infect people in more than 40 countries and territories around the world, killing over 2,700 people.

The big picture: Most of the 80,000 COVID-19 infections have occurred in mainland China. But cases are starting to surge elsewhere. By Wednesday morning, the worst affected countries outside China were South Korea (1,146), where a U.S. soldier tested positive to the virus, Italy (332), Japan (170), Iran (95) and Singapore (91). Just Tuesday, new cases were confirmed in Switzerland, Croatia and Algeria.

Debate night: Candidates' last face-off before Super Tuesday

Sanders, Biden, Klobuchar and Steyer in South Carolina on Feb. 25. Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Bernie Sanders wanted to keep his momentum after winning contests in New Hampshire and Nevada, while former Vice President Joe Biden hoped to keep his own campaign alive. The other five candidates were just trying to hang on.

What's happening: Seven contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination were in Charleston, South Carolina, for the tenth debate, just days before the South Carolina primary and a week before Super Tuesday. They spoke, sometimes over each other, about health care, Russian interference in the election, foreign policy the economy, gun control, marijuana, education, and race.

Go deeperArrowUpdated 3 hours ago - Politics & Policy

4 takeaways from the South Carolina debate

Former Vice President Joe Biden, right, makes a point during Tuesday's Democratic presidential debate, while Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders listens. Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

The 10th Democratic debate was billed as the most consequential of the primary thus far, but Tuesday night's high-stakes affair was at times awkward and unfocused as moderators struggled to rein in candidates desperate to make one last splash before Saturday's primary in South Carolina and Super Tuesday.

The big picture: After cementing himself as the Democratic favorite with a sweeping win in Nevada, Sen. Bernie Sanders came under fire as the front-runner for the first time on the debate stage. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who will be on the ballot for the first time next Tuesday, was a progressive foil once again, but he appeared more prepared after taking a drubbing at the Nevada debate.