Johns Hopkins surgeons operate on a patient. Photo: Brendan Smialowski / AFP via Getty Images

States' broad flexibility over health policy can produce some awkward effects for health care providers that operate across state lines — as Johns Hopkins Health System can show you.

The bottom line: Johns Hopkins mostly operates in Maryland, which caps hospital revenue. But it also owns a facility outside of the state that is not bound to those restrictions. And you can tell the difference by looking at their bottom lines.

The details: Maryland uses all-payer rate setting, a payment system that limits how much money hospitals in the state can get from Maryland patients. Inpatient and outpatient spending in the state can't grow faster than 3.58% per year (the rate of growth for Maryland's economy).

Johns Hopkins, an academic powerhouse based in Baltimore that owns six hospitals, reported its finances yesterday for the last six months of 2017.

  • Revenue grew a little above the all-payer rate. Operating profit fell 8.6% year over year to $82 million, due to losses in the system's Medicaid health plan.
  • But profits increased heavily at Sibley Memorial Hospital, a 288-bed hospital in Washington, D.C., that is not bound by Maryland's rules. Johns Hopkins said Sibley's profits were "driven by higher inpatient and outpatient volumes across several areas, including oncology and surgical cases."
  • Sibley was the most profitable hospital in the Johns Hopkins system in the last three months of 2017, just ahead of a children's hospital in Florida.

Why it matters: Hospitals in the rest of the country are regulated like Sibley, which means they have incentives to get more admissions and perform more procedures in the absence of large-scale reform like all-payer rate setting.

Go deeper: A former Johns Hopkins employee filed a lawsuit last year claiming that the system favors out-of-state patients to boost revenue; the system said that suit was baseless.

Go deeper

Trump's 2 chilling debate warnings

Photo: Morry Gash/Pool via Getty Images

One of the few groups in America with anything to celebrate after last night's loud, ugly, rowdy presidential "debate" was the violent, far-right Proud Boys, after President Trump pointedly refused to condemn white supremacist groups.

Why it matters: This was a for-the-history-books moment in a debate that was mostly headache-inducing noise. Trump failed to condemn racist groups after four months when millions marched for racial justice in the country's largest wave of activism in half a century.

Ina Fried, author of Login
36 mins ago - Technology

Candidates go online to cut through debate noise

Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

While President Trump and Joe Biden fought to be heard in a rowdy debate Tuesday, both campaigns sought to draw digital battle lines and occupy online turf they could have all to themselves.

The big picture: Trump's impulsive Twitter style made a shambles of the debate format, but online the candidates were able to find niches where they couldn't be interrupted — and could motivate their supporters to donate, organize and turn out to vote.

Ben Geman, author of Generate
1 hour ago - Energy & Environment

Shell plans up to 9,000 job cuts by 2022

A Shell station in Brazil. Photo: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Royal Dutch Shell will shed up to 9,000 jobs as it undergoes a long-term restructuring around climate-friendly energy sources and continues to grapple with the coronavirus pandemic that has battered the oil industry.

Why it matters: The cuts could amount to over 10% of the company's global workforce, which was 83,000 at the end of 2019.

Get Axios AM in your inbox

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!