Get the latest market trends in your inbox

Stay on top of the latest market trends and economic insights with the Axios Markets newsletter. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Denver news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Des Moines news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Minneapolis-St. Paul

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tampa-St. Petersburg news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa-St. Petersburg

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

A Medicaid patient waits to be treated. Photo: Gerry Broome / AP

The Trump administration has approved a waiver from Iowa, effective Nov. 1, that says the state will not have to provide Medicaid coverage to low-income people for the three months prior to when they applied.

Between the lines: Conservatives say the waiver from Medicaid's three-month retroactive eligibility will encourage people to sign up for Medicaid quickly and prevent people from only applying once they are sick. But consumer advocates are worried the move, which will deny retroactive benefits to 40,000 Iowans to save $37 million, will lead to high medical bills for seniors and people with disabilities.

The details: This is one of the first major Medicaid waivers approved under Seema Verma, who helped engineer several other states' waiver applications before taking the helm at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Here's how the main provisions stack up:

  • Removing the three-month retroactive eligibility period will apply to all Iowa Medicaid recipients, except for pregnant women and infants younger than 1.
  • Federal Medicaid law requires backdated eligibility to protect low-income people from high medical bills, especially in situations like traumatic events or accidents that prevent people from signing up for Medicaid immediately.
  • Twenty-three of the 27 public comments on the waiver were opposed to eliminating the three months of retroactive Medicaid benefits. Consumer advocates argued the move could plunge the most vulnerable people into medical debt. Hospitals and doctors didn't like it because they would have to absorb more charity care.
  • However, despite the negative feedback, Iowa had to apply for the elimination of retroactive Medicaid benefits because the state's Republican-led legislature passed a law requiring it.
  • Arkansas, Indiana and New Hampshire also have waivers for retroactive eligibility, but some strings are attached.

Looking ahead: MaryBeth Musumeci, a Medicaid expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation, said Iowa's approval is consistent with the view Verma and then-Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price outlined in a letter to governors earlier this year — that they want to make Medicaid more like commercial health insurance. Now, the big question marks are whether Iowa will conduct outreach to inform Medicaid members of the change, and whether other states will try to mimic Iowa's conservative waiver.

Go deeper

Updated 4 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Supreme Court backs religious groups on New York coronavirus restrictions

Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled late Wednesday that restrictions previously imposed on New York places of worship by Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) during the coronavirus pandemic violated the First Amendment.

Why it matters: The decision in a 5-4 vote heralds the first significant action by the new President Trump-appointed conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who cast the deciding vote in favor of the Catholic Church and Orthodox Jewish synagogues.

USAID chief tests positive for coronavirus

An Air Force cargo jet delivers USAID supplies to Russia earlier this year. Photo: Mikhail Metzel/TASS via Getty Images

The acting administrator of the United States Agency for International Development informed senior staff Wednesday he has tested positive for coronavirus, two sources familiar with the call tell Axios.

Why it matters: John Barsa, who staffers say rarely wears a mask in their office, is the latest in a series of senior administration officials to contract the virus. His positive diagnosis comes amid broader turmoil at the agency following the election.

Bryan Walsh, author of Future
11 hours ago - Health

COVID-19 shows a bright future for vaccines

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

Promising results from COVID-19 vaccine trials offer hope not just that the pandemic could be ended sooner than expected, but that medicine itself may have a powerful new weapon.

Why it matters: Vaccines are, in the words of one expert, "the single most life-saving innovation ever," but progress had slowed in recent years. New gene-based technology that sped the arrival of the COVID vaccine will boost the overall field, and could even extend to mass killers like cancer.