AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

A little-noticed provision of the Senate health care bill — one that provides new insurance options for small businesses and the self-employed — could have big consequences, potentially making it harder for sick people to get affordable coverage.

  • What the experts say: The provision, as written, could cause "fragmentation of the market resulting from an unlevel playing field. This is likely to lead to cherry-picking, adverse selection, and increased costs for sicker individuals," the American Academy of Actuaries wrote in a letter to members of Congress and governors.
  • This echoes concerns about Sen. Ted Cruz' proposal to let some insurers offer plans that don't comply with the Affordable Care Act's regulations. "This is kind of a baby version of the Cruz amendment, in that it creates a parallel, much more loosely regulated insurance market," Larry Levitt, vice president of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, told me.
  • What we're watching: Whether the provision, which establishes "small business health plans," starts to get more attention among Republican senators. Although conservatives support the idea, wary moderates could be turned off by its potential consequences.

The Senate bill would allow small businesses and self-employed workers to use a new type of health plan — essentially a form of association health plans. And, unlike policies sold in the existing small-group market, those new plans wouldn't have to follow some of the ACA's regulations.They wouldn't have to abide by the same protections for people with pre-existing conditions, nor would they be required to cover the ACA's essential health benefits.

Some experts are worried about how all this would work:

  • Small employers could get coverage from these small-business health plans when their employees are healthy, but then move back into the normal small-group market — which is subject to the ACA's regulations — when their employees are sick. Keeping healthy people out of the traditional small-group market could make it more expensive and less predictable.
  • Self-employed people could make the same switch, which could disrupt the individual market in some states.
  • This could cause instability and premium hikes in the individual and small-group markets. In 2014, one-fifth of the people who bought coverage through the ACA's exchanges were small-business owners or self-employed.
  • A Kaiser Family Foundation brief explores the issue in more depth.

Yes, but:

  • Obama-era regulations could mitigate some of the potential disruption. Those rules allowed some people — including many healthy people — to keep their pre-ACA coverage or sign up for new policies that also didn't comply with all of the law.
  • Something similar is already happening, on a small scale, without dire consequences: Employers who self-insure do not have to follow all of the ACA's regulations. But only a small percentage of businesses self-insure. A far greater number would be eligible for the GOP bill's new offerings.

A potential fix: "If the rules governing [association health plans] were consistent with those governing non-[association health plans], there would be fewer concerns about market fragmentation," the actuaries wrote.

Go deeper

"Hamilton" is a streaming hit for Disney+

Data: Google Trends; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

The debut of "Hamilton" on Disney+ last Friday sent downloads of the app soaring over the weekend.

Why it matters: With theaters closed until 2021, "Hamilton" is the biggest litmus test for whether Broadway will ever be able to successfully transition some of its iconic hits.

Wall Street is no longer betting on Trump

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Betting markets have turned decisively toward an expected victory for Joe Biden in November — and asset managers at major investment banks are preparing for not only a Biden win, but potentially a Democratic sweep of the Senate and House too.

Why it matters: Wall Street had its chips on a Trump win until recently — even in the midst of the coronavirus-induced recession and Biden's rise in the polls.

With new security law, China outlaws global activism

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

The draconian security law that Beijing forced upon Hong Kong last week contains an article making it illegal for anyone in the world to promote democratic reform for Hong Kong.

Why it matters: China has long sought to crush organized dissent abroad through quiet threats and coercion. Now it has codified that practice into law — potentially forcing people and companies around the world to choose between speaking freely and ever stepping foot in Hong Kong again.