Sep 26, 2018

High power demand could reduce business appeal of AVs

A test engineer in a driverless taxi in the citty of Innopolis, Russia. Photo: Yegor Aleyev/TASS via Getty Images

The development of autonomous vehicles (AV) continues at a fast pace. Ford and GM, for example, have invested heavily into this technology to launch commercial models as early as 2020, while Japan hopes to showcase AVs at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics manufactured by Toyota and Honda. As remarkable as these advances are, significant business challenges remain.

The big picture: Automation comes at a price, and that price is power. The more autonomous features a vehicle has, the more power it requires from its battery system. As AV technology develops, larger batteries will be required that will, in turn, require longer charger times.

AVs will boast varying levels of automation, from driver assistance to full automation, whereby the vehicle will use onboard cameras, GPS, lidar, radar and other sensing technologies to drive without any human interaction. Enabling these features requires a multitude of computers, sensors and management systems for the vehicle to operate efficiently and safely. Because these features require a substantial amount of power, the estimated equivalent of 50–100 laptops, they are likely to reduce the operating hours and distance of the vehicle.

Larger battery systems also require longer charging times, which will create inefficiencies that could diminish AVs' business appeal, especially for ride-hailing services: Longer charges mean less time on the road generating revenue. Fast charging, wireless charging and battery swapping could provide potential solutions, as might vehicles that rely on hybrid, rather than exclusively electric, power. As some conventional gasoline cars are considered gas guzzlers, so too could AVs prove to be electricity guzzlers because of the size and power needs of their batteries. Fleet and ride-sharing AVs will also be subjected to more frequent charging cycles, which wear on the battery, adding still more costs.

The bottom line: The business case for AVs will depend on a number of factors, not least among them the battery power needed to make the vehicle autonomous. AV manufacturers will need to come up with unique solutions, in addition to battery strategies that include better onboard and remote supercomputing capabilities, to make this a profitable technology. 

Maggie Teliska is a technical specialist at Caldwell Intellectual Property Law, an intellectual property law firm. She is also a member of GLG, a platform connecting businesses with industry experts.

Go deeper

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 3 p.m. ET: 5,931,112 — Total deaths: 357,929 — Total recoveries — 2,388,172Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 3 p.m. ET: 1,711,313 — Total deaths: 101,129 — Total recoveries: 391,508 — Total tested: 15,192,481Map.
  3. States: New York to allow private businesses to deny entry to customers without masks.
  4. Public health: Louisiana Sen. Cassidy wants more frequent testing of nursing home workers.
  5. Congress: Pelosi slams McConnell on stimulus delay — Sen. Tim Kaine and wife test positive for coronavirus antibodies.
  6. Tech: Twitter fact-checks Chinese official's claims that coronavirus originated in U.S.
  7. What should I do? When you can be around others after contracting the coronavirus — Traveling, asthma, dishes, disinfectants and being contagiousMasks, lending books and self-isolatingExercise, laundry, what counts as soap — Pets, moving and personal healthAnswers about the virus from Axios expertsWhat to know about social distancingHow to minimize your risk.
  8. Other resources: CDC on how to avoid the virus, what to do if you get it, the right mask to wear.

Subscribe to Mike Allen's Axios AM to follow our coronavirus coverage each morning from your inbox.

Updated 28 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Twitter fact-checks Chinese official's claims that coronavirus originated in U.S.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian. Photo: Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images

Twitter slapped a fact-check label on a pair of months-old tweets from a Chinese government spokesperson that falsely suggested that the coronavirus originated in the U.S. and was brought to Wuhan by the U.S. military, directing users to "get the facts about COVID-19."

Why it matters: The labels were added after criticism that Twitter had fact-checked tweets from President Trump about mail-in voting, but not other false claims from Chinese Communist Party officials and other U.S. adversaries.

Podcast: Trump vs. Twitter, round two

President Trump is escalating his response to Twitter’s fact check of his recent tweets about mail-in voting, issuing an executive order that's designed to begin limiting social media's liability protections. Dan digs in with Axios' Margaret Harding McGill.

Go deeper: Twitter vs. Trump... vs. Twitter

2 hours ago - Politics & Policy