Mark Schiefelbein / AP

A new NYT report details how the Chinese government thwarted the CIA's intelligence gathering operations by killing or imprisoning 18 to 20 CIA spies or sources over a two-year period starting in 2010.

The details: "From the final weeks of 2010 through the end of 2012, according to former American officials, the Chinese killed at least a dozen of the C.I.A.'s sources. According to three of the officials, one was shot in front of his colleagues in the courtyard of a government building — a message to others who might have been working for the C.I.A."

Why it matters: This shows the sophistication of the Chinese government's spy services (similar to Russia) and how successful China is at squashing the United States' spying efforts. Furthermore, it demonstrates how difficult it continues to be for the US to carry out counterespionage investigations in foreign nations — and the CIA views its spying efforts in China one of its top priorities.

How China's efforts were discovered, per NYT:

  • The quality of information the CIA was receiving about China was "the best it had been for years" in early 2010, but come 2011 the information slowed and the CIA realized it was quickly losing sources in China.
  • The CIA and FBI launched a joint investigation into its spying operations in Beijing. They called the top-secret investigation "Honey Badger."
  • More sources continued to disappear, so Honey Badger became more urgent.
  • "Some investigators believed the Chinese had cracked the encrypted method that the C.I.A. used to communicate with its assets. Others suspected a traitor in the C.I.A."
  • The suspect: A Chinese-American who had left the CIA shortly before the CIA's sources began vanishing.
  • "Some investigators believed he had become disgruntled and had begun spying for China. One official said the man had access to the identities of C.I.A. informants and fit all the indicators on a matrix used to identify espionage threats."
  • By 2013, the CIA and FBI determined that China's previous success in finding and stopping the CIA sources had been thwarted, though it is not clear how their efforts were blunted.

Go deeper

Updated 11 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 30,306,469 — Total deaths: 948,147— Total recoveries: 20,626,515Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 6,705,114 — Total deaths: 198,197 — Total recoveries: 2,540,334 — Total tests: 92,163,649Map.
  3. Politics: In reversal, CDC again recommends coronavirus testing for asymptomatic people.
  4. Health: Massive USPS face mask operation called off The risks of moving too fast on a vaccine.
  5. Business: Unemployment drop-off reverses course 1 million mortgage-holders fall through safety netHow the pandemic has deepened Boeing's 737 MAX crunch.
  6. Education: At least 42% of school employees are vulnerable.

Court battles shift mail-in voting deadlines in battleground states

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Michigan joins Pennsylvania in extending mail-in ballot deadlines by several days after the election, due to the coronavirus pandemic and expected delays in U.S. Postal Service.

The latest: Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens ruled that all ballots postmarked before Nov. 2 must be counted, so long as they arrive in the mail before election results are certified. Michigan will certify its general election results on Nov. 23.

Ina Fried, author of Login
41 mins ago - Technology

Interview: Unity CEO explains his company's unusual IPO

CEO John Riccitiello virtually ringing the NYSE bell as Unity shares began trading on Friday. PhotoL Unity

Unity Technologies was just one of many companies with blockbuster IPOs this week, but it took a decidedly different approach, using data rather than handshakes to decide who got to invest and at what price. CEO John Riccitiello explained why in an interview with Axios.

Why it matters: Traditionally, bankers and companies set IPO prices based on conversations and expectations, a process that has been criticized as basically leaving money on the table.